The DOI matches its Crossref record; 186 of the 186 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Inferring the mammal tree: Species-level sets of phylogenies for questions in ecology, evolution, and conservation
Open accessAbstract
Big, time-scaled phylogenies are fundamental to connecting evolutionary processes to modern biodiversity patterns. Yet inferring reliable phylogenetic trees for thousands of species involves numerous trade-offs that have limited their utility to comparative biologists. To establish a robust evolutionary timescale for all approximately 6,000 living species of mammals, we developed credible sets of trees that capture root-to-tip uncertainty in topology and divergence times. Our "backbone-and-patch" approach to tree building applies a newly assembled 31-gene supermatrix to two levels of Bayesian inference: (1) backbone relationships and ages among major lineages, using fossil node or tip dating, and (2) species-level "patch" phylogenies with nonoverlapping in-groups that each correspond to one representative lineage in the backbone. Species unsampled for DNA are either excluded ("DNA-only" trees) or imputed within taxonomic constraints using branch lengths drawn from local birth-death models ("completed" trees). Joining time-scaled patches to backbones results in species-level trees of extant Mammalia with all branches estimated under the same modeling framework, thereby facilitating rate comparisons among lineages as disparate as marsupials and placentals. We compare our phylogenetic trees to previous estimates of mammal-wide phylogeny and divergence times, finding that (1) node ages are broadly concordant among studies, and (2) recent (tip-level) rates of speciation are estimated more accurately in our study than in previous "supertree" approaches, in which unresolved nodes led to branch-length artifacts. Credible sets of mammalian phylogenetic history are now available for download at http://vertlife.org/phylosubsets, enabling investigations of long-standing questions in comparative biology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs
Altschul, S. (1997) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · Cited by 73,302
RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies
Stamatakis, A. (2014) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033 · Cited by 32,291
MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian Phylogenetic Inference and Model Choice Across a Large Model Space
Ronquist, F., Teslenko, M., van der Mark, P., Ayres, D. L., Darling, A., Höhna, S., Larget, B., Liu, L., Suchard, M. A., & Huelsenbeck, J. P. (2012) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/sys029 · Cited by 27,843
Kearse, M., Moir, R., Wilson, A., Stones-Havas, S., Cheung, M., Sturrock, S., Buxton, S., Cooper, A., Markowitz, S., Duran, C., et al. (2012) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199 · Cited by 20,027
APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language
Paradis, E., Claude, J., & Strimmer, K. (2004) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btg412 · Cited by 11,335
Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees
Miller, M. A., Pfeiffer, W., & Schwartz, T. (2010) · 2010 Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE) · doi:10.1109/gce.2010.5676129 · Cited by 11,228
Bayesian Phylogenetics with BEAUti and the BEAST 1.7
Drummond, A. J., Suchard, M. A., Xie, D., & Rambaut, A. (2012) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/mss075 · Cited by 10,063
Lanfear, R., Calcott, B., Ho, S. Y. W., & Guindon, S. (2012) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/mss020 · Cited by 5,732
Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference
Schmid, R., Wilson, D. E., & Reeder, D. M. (1993) · Taxon · doi:10.2307/1223169 · Cited by 5,386
Species diversity in space and time
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-2720 · Cited by 4,573
Cited by
Vincze, O., Colchero, F., Lemaître, J.-F., Conde, D. A., Pavard, S., Bieuville, M., Urrutia, A. O., Ujvari, B., Boddy, A. M., Maley, C. C., et al. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-04224-5 · Cited by 226
Shortfalls and opportunities in terrestrial vertebrate species discovery
Moura, M. R., & Jetz, W. (2021) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-021-01411-5 · Cited by 196
Self-citationThe emerging phylogenetic perspective on the evolution of actinopterygian fishes
Dornburg, A., & Near, T. J. (2021) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-122120-122554 · Cited by 95
Analysis of biodiversity data suggests that mammal species are hidden in predictable places
Parsons, D. J., Pelletier, T. A., Wieringa, J. G., Duckett, D. J., & Carstens, B. C. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2103400119 · Cited by 52
Phylogenetic reconstruction based on synteny block and gene adjacencies
Drillon, G., Champeimont, R., Oteri, F., Fischer, G., & Carbone, A. (2020) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msaa114 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Upham, N. S., Esselstyn, J. A., & Jetz, W.
- Venue
- PLOS Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2019-12-04
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- e3000494
- ISSN
- 1544-9173 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-7885
- OpenAlex
- W2991998196
- Cited by
- 1,201
- References
- 186
- FWCI
- 76.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inferring the mammal tree: Species-level sets of phylogenies for questions in ecology, evolution, and conservation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000494
- The paper
- Upham, N. S., Esselstyn, J. A., & Jetz, W. (2019). Inferring the mammal tree: Species-level sets of phylogenies for questions in ecology, evolution, and conservation. PLOS Biology. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000494
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.