The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exploitation of Sexual Signals by Predators and Parasitoids
Open accessAbstract
Signals used to attract mates are often conspicuous to predators and parasites, and their evolution via sexual selection is expected to be opposed by viability selection. Many secondary sexual traits may represent a compromise between attractiveness and avoidance of detection. Although such signal exploitation appears to be widespread, most examples come from species that use acoustic or olfactory mating signals, and relatively few cases of visual signal exploitation can be substantiated. Because males are usually the signaling sex, they are more at risk from predators or parasitoids that locate prey or hosts by sexual signals; this differential selection on the two sexes can affect the intensity of sexual selection on male ornamental traits. The notable exception to male signaling and female attraction occurs in pheromone-producing insects, particularly lepidopterans, which show an opposite pattern of female odor production. Exploitation of such sex pheromones is relatively rare. We discuss reasons for the reversal in sex roles in these species and its implications for signal exploitation. Changes in signals that appear to be adaptations to avoid predation include the use of different signal modalities, changes in signaling behavior, loss of signals, and alteration of signal characteristics such as pitch. Selection pressure from signal exploiters could lead to the production of a novel signal and thus facilitate speciation. Relatively little work has been done on adaptations on the part of the exploiting species, but such adaptations could indirectly influence the mating system of the predator or parasitoid. Signal exploitation is also expected to be a fruitful source of examples of coevolution. Finally, plants emit attractants analogous to secondary sex characters in animals, and may also be vulnerable to signal exploitation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mate selection—A selection for a handicap
Zahavi, A. (1975) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(75)90111-3 · Cited by 5,251
Signals, Signal Conditions, and the Direction of Evolution
Endler, J. A. (1992) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285308 · Cited by 1,960
Evans, M. R., & Thomas, A. L. R. (1992) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/s0003-3472(05)80229-5 · Cited by 133
Cited by
A socio-relational framework of sex differences in the expression of emotion
Vigil, J. M. (2009) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x09991075 · Cited by 173
The Bird Dawn Chorus Revisited
Gil, D., & Llusia, D. (2020) · Animal Signals and Communication · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-39200-0_3 · Cited by 108
Vocal communication in social groups
Fichtel, C., & Manser, M. (2010) · Animal Behaviour: Evolution and Mechanisms · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-02624-9_2 · Cited by 94
Co-opting evo-devo concepts for new insights into mechanisms of behavioural diversity
Hoke, K. L., Adkins-Regan, E., Bass, A. H., McCune, A. R., & Wolfner, M. F. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.190058 · Cited by 42
Stress Coping Styles and Singing Behavior in the Short-Tailed Singing Mouse (Scotinomys Teguina)
Crino, O. L., Larkin, I., & Phelps, S. M. (2010) · Hormones and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2010.02.011 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Zuk, M., & Kolluru, G. R.
- Venue
- The Quarterly Review of Biology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1998-12
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 415-438
- ISSN
- 0033-5770 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-7718
- OpenAlex
- W2096636408
- Cited by
- 836
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exploitation of Sexual Signals by Predators and Parasitoids. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/420412
- The paper
- Zuk, M., & Kolluru, G. R. (1998). Exploitation of Sexual Signals by Predators and Parasitoids. The Quarterly Review of Biology. https://doi.org/10.1086/420412
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.