Abundances In Very Metal‐Poor Dwarf Stars
Open accessAbstract
We discuss the detailed composition of 28 extremely metal-poor (EMP) dwarfs, 22 of which are from the Hamburg/ESO Survey (HES), based on Keck echelle spectra. Our sample has a median [Fe/H] of -2.7 dex, extends to -3.5 dex, and is somewhat less metal-poor than was expected from [Fe/H](HK, HES) determined from low-resolution spectra. Our analysis supports the existence of a sharp decline in the distribution of halo stars with metallicity below [Fe/H] = -3.0 dex. So far no additional turnoff stars with [Fe/H] < -3.5 have been identified in our follow-up efforts. For the best-observed elements between Mg and Ni, we find that the abundance ratios appear to have reached a plateau, i.e., [X/Fe] is approximately constant as a function of [Fe/H], except for Cr, Mn, and Co, which show trends of abundance ratios varying with [Fe/H]. These abundance ratios at low metallicity correspond approximately to the yield expected from Type II supernovae (SNe) with a narrow range in mass and explosion parameters; high-mass Type II SN progenitors are required. The dispersion of [X/Fe] about this plateau level is surprisingly small and is still dominated by measurement errors rather than intrinsic scatter. These results place strong constraints on the characteristics of the contributing SNe. The dispersion in neutron-capture elements and the abundance trends for Cr, Mn, and Co are consistent with previous studies of evolved EMP stars. We find halo-like enhancements for the α-elements Mg, Ca, and Ti, but solar Si/Fe ratios for these dwarfs. This contrasts with studies of EMP giant stars, which show Si enhancements similar to other α-elements. Sc/Fe is another case where the results from EMP dwarfs and from EMP giants disagree; our Sc/Fe ratios are enhanced compared to the solar value by ~0.2 dex. Although this conflicts with the solar Sc/Fe values seen in EMP giants, we note that α-like Sc/Fe ratios have been claimed for dwarfs at higher metallicity. Two dwarfs in the sample are carbon stars, while two others have significant C enhancements, all with 12 C/ 13 C ~7 and with C/N between 10 and 150. Three of these C-rich stars have large enhancements of the heavy neutron capture elements, including lead, which implies a strong s -process contribution, presumably from binary mass transfer; the fourth shows no excess of Sr or Ba.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The observed C isotopic ratios of unevolved (log g ≥ 3) CEMP stars are ≲10.
“Figure 7 from Stancliffe et al. (2009) illustrates the observed C isotopic ratios of unevolved (log g ≥ 3) CEMP stars are ≲ 10 (e.g., Cohen et al. 2004; Sivarani et al. 2006; Jonsell et al. 2006; Aoki et al. 2007; Beers et al. 2007; Lucatello et al. 2011).”
From The Dawes Review 2: Nucleosynthesis and Stellar Yields of Low- and Intermediate-Mass Single Stars (2014) · cites this paper as Cohen et al. 2004
Cites
Arnett, D. (1996) · doi:10.1515/9780691221663 · Cited by 619 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Dawes Review 2: Nucleosynthesis and Stellar Yields of Low- and Intermediate-Mass Single Stars
Karakas, A. I., & Lattanzio, J. C. (2014) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia · doi:10.1017/pasa.2014.21 · Cited by 735 · see citing works
“10 (e.g., Cohen et al. 2004; Sivarani et al. 2006; Jonsell et al. 2006; Aoki et al. 2007; Beers et al. 2007; Lucatello et al. 2011).”
Tumlinson, J. (2010) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/708/2/1398 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cohen, J. G., Christlieb, N., McWilliam, A., Shectman, S., Thompson, I., Wasserburg, G. J., Ivans, I., Dehn, M., Karlsson, T., & Melendez, J.
- Affiliations
- California Institute of Technology (US)
- Universität Hamburg (DE)
- Carnegie Observatories (US)
- Uppsala University (SE)
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2004-09-10
- Volume
- 612
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1107-1135
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W1975083134
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 6.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (0205951)
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NAS 526555)
- W. M. Keck Foundation
- California Institute of Technology
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Keywords
- extremely metal-poor stars, dwarf stars, chemical abundances, abundance ratios, neutron-capture elements, s-process nucleosynthesis, binary mass transfer, carbon stars, alpha elements, Hamburg/ESO survey, Galactic halo
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review