Cited by 132Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesAstro and Planetary ScienceAstronomy and Astrophysical Research

Transit Detectability of Ring Systems around Extrasolar Giant Planets

Open access
Barnes, Jason W., Fortney, Jonathan J.·2004·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We investigate whether rings around extrasolar planets could be detected from those planets' transit light curves. To this end, we develop a basic theoretical framework for calculating and interpreting the light curves of ringed planet transits on the basis of the existing framework used for stellar occultations, a technique that has been effective for discovering and probing ring systems in the solar system. We find that the detectability of large Saturn-like ring systems is largest during ingress and egress and that a reasonable photometric precision of ~(1-3) × 10 -4 with 15 minute time resolution should be sufficient to discover such ring systems. For some ring particle sizes, diffraction around individual particles leads to a detectable level of forward-scattering that can be used to measure modal ring particle diameters. An initial census of large ring systems can be carried out using high-precision follow-up observations of detected transits and by the upcoming NASA Kepler mission. The distribution of ring systems as a function of stellar age and as a function of planetary semimajor axis will provide empirical evidence to help constrain how rings form and how long rings last.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/425067

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Transits of giant planets with ring systems produce a distinct and detectable light curve.

    “The transits of giant planets with ring systems produce a distinct and detectable light curve (Barnes & Fortney 2004;Tusnski & Valio 2011), and searches for the transit timing variations caused by attendant exomoons are ongoing (Kipping et al. 2012(Kipping et al. , 2013)).”
  • There has been negligible investigation of the observability of the dense proto-satellite disks that likely existed during the first about 10^7 years.

    “there has been negligible investigation of the observability of the dense proto-satellite disks that likely existed during the first ∼10 7 years.”

    From PLANETARY CONSTRUCTION ZONES IN OCCULTATION: DISCOVERY OF AN EXTRASOLAR RING SYSTEM TRANSITING A YOUNG SUN-LIKE STAR AND FUTURE PROSPECTS FOR DETECTING ECLIPSES BY CIRCUMSECONDARY AND CIRCUMPLANETARY DISKS (2012) · cites this paper as Barnes & Fortney 2004

    Section 2.2 discusses how the prevalence of planetary rings might vary with stellar age, and the Abstract addresses detecting Saturn-like rings in transit light curves. Neither passage addresses whether dense proto-satellite disks existed during the first ~10^7 years or how much their observability has been investigated. Searches for proto-satellite disks and that timescale found no relevant passage in our copy; page numbers were unavailable. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [18]18. Hecht, E. 1998, Optics ( Reading: Addison-Wesley)
  2. [20]20. Horne, K. 2003, in ASP Conf. Ser. 294, Scientific Frontiers in Research on Extrasolar Planets, ed D. Deming & S. Seager (San Francisco: ASP), 361
  3. [28]28. Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T., & Flannery, B. P. 1992, Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing (2nd. ed.; Cam- bridge: Cambridge Univ. Press)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barnes, J. W., & Fortney, J. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • Ames Research Center (US)
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2004-12
Volume
616
Issue
2
Pages
1193-1203
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2060286211
Cited by
132
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
Keywords
planetary rings, exoplanets, giant planets, transit light curves, stellar occultation, ring particle size, forward scattering, diffraction, Kepler mission

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review