Cited by 877Water Governance and InfrastructureWater Resource Management and QualityChild Nutrition and Water Access

Water For Life: The impact of the privatization of water services on child mortality

Open access
Galiani, Sebastian, Gertler, Paul, Schargrodsky, Ernesto·2005·Journal of Political Economy

Abstract

While most countries are committed to increasing access to safe water and thereby reducing child mortality, there is little consensus on how to actually improve water services. One important proposal under discussion is whether to privatize water provision. In the 1990s Argentina embarked on one of the largest privatization campaigns in the world, including the privatization of local water companies covering approximately 30 percent of the country’s municipalities. Using the variation in ownership of water provision across time and space generated by the privatization process, we find that child mortality fell 8 percent in the areas that privatized their water services and that the effect was largest (26 percent) in the poorest areas. We check the robustness of these estimates using cause‐specific mortality. While privatization is associated with significant reductions in deaths from infectious and parasitic diseases, it is uncorrelated with deaths from causes unrelated to water conditions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/426041

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Angrist, J. (1995): "Introduction to the JBES Symposium on Program and Policy Evaluation", Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 13, pp. 249-88.
  2. Armstrong, M., S. Cowan, and J. Vickers (1994): Regulatory Reform: Economic Analysis and British Experience, Cambridge: MIT Press.
  3. Savedoff, W. and P. Spiller (eds.), Spilled Water, Washington D.C.: IDB Press.
  4. Barberis N., M. Boycko, A. Shleifer and N. Tsukanova (1996): "How Does Privatization Work? Evidence from the Russian Shops", Journal of Political Economy 104 (4), pp. 764-90.
  5. Behrman, J. and B. Wolfe (1987): "How Does Mother's Schooling Affect Family Health, Nutrition, Medical Care Usage and Household Sanitation?", Journal of Econometrics 36, pp. 185-204.
  6. Cebu Team (1991): "Underlying and Proximate Determinants of Child Health: The Cebu Longitudinal Health and Nutrition Survey", American Journal of Epidemiology 33 (2), pp. 185-201.
  7. Chamberlain, G. (1984): "Panel Data", in Griliches, Z. and M. Intriligator (eds.), Handbook of Econometrics, Volume 2, Amsterdam: North-Holland.
  8. Chisari, O., A. Estache, and C. Romero (1999): "Winners and Losers from the Privatization and Regulation of Utilities: Lessons from a General Equilibrium Model of Argentina", World Bank Economic Review, 13 (2), pp. 357-78.
  9. Esrey, S., J. Potash, L. Roberts, and C. Shiff (1991): "Effects of Improved Water Supply and Sanitation on Ascariasis, Diarrhea, Dracunculiasis, Hookworm Infection, Schistosomiasis and Trachoma", Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 69 (5), 609-21.
  10. Estache, A. , A. Gomez-Lobo, and D. Leipziger (2001): "Utilities Privatization and the Poor: Lessons and Evidence from Latin America", World Development, 29 (7), pp. 1179-98.
  11. Foster, V. (1999): "Literature Review for Regional Studies Project on Privatization and Infraestructure Services of the Urban Poor", mimeo, World Bank.
  12. Finnegan, W. (2002): "Letter from Boliv ia: Leasing the Rain", The New Yorker, April 8, pp. 43- 53.
  13. Frydman, R., C. Gray, M. Hessel, and A. Rapaczynsku (1999): "When Does Privatization Work? The Impact of Private Ownership on Corporate Performance in the Transition Economies", Quarterly Journal of Economics 114 (4), pp. 1153-91.
  14. Galiani, S. and D. Petrecolla (1996): "The Changing Role of the Public Sector: An Ex-post View of the Privatization Process in Argentina", Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 36 (2), pp. 131-52.
  15. Galiani, S., P. Gertler, E. Schargrodsky and F. Sturzenegger (2002): "The Benefits and Costs of Privatization in Argentina: A Microeconomic Analysis", forthcoming in Chong, A. and F. Lopez-de-Silanes (eds.), The Benefits and Costs of Privatizations.
  16. Gerchunoff, P., editor (1992): Las Privatizaciones en Argentina -Primera Etapa, Buenos Aires: Instituto Torcuato Di Tella. Heckman, J. and V. Hotz (1989): "Choosing among Alternative Non-experimental Methods for Estimating the Impact of Social Programs: The Case of Manpower Trainin g", Journal of the American Statistical Association 84 (408), pp. 862-74.
  17. Heckman, J., H. Ichimura and P. Todd (1997): "Matching as an Econometric Evaluation Estimator: Evidence from Evaluating a Job Training Program", Review of Economic Studies 64 (4), pp. 605-54.
  18. Heckman, J., H. Ichimura and P. Todd (1998b): "Matching as an Econometric Evaluation Estimator", Review of Economic Studies 65 (2), pp. 261-94.
  19. Heckman, J., R. LaLonde and J. Smith (2000): "The Economics and Econometrics of Active Labor Market Programs", in Ashenfelter, O. and D. Card (eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics, Volume 3A, Amsterdam: North-Holland.
  20. Heckman, J. and R. Robb Jr. (1985): "Alternative Methods for Evaluating the Impact of Interventions: An Overview", Journal of Econometrics 30 (1-2), pp. 239-67.
  21. Heymann, D. and F. Navajas (1989): "Conflicto Distributivo y Déficit Fiscal. Notas sobre la Experiencia Argentina, 1970-1987", Desarrollo Económico 29 (115), pp. 309-29.
  22. Jalan, J. and M. Ravallion (2002): "Does Piped Water Reduce Diarrhea for Children in Rural India?", forthcoming in Journal of Econometrics.
  23. Jenkins, S. (1995): "Easy Estimation Methods for Discrete-time Duration Models", Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 57 (1), pp. 129-138.
  24. La Porta, R. and F. Lopez-De-Silanes (1999): "The Benefits of Privatization: Evidence from Mexico", Quarterly Journal of Economics 114 (4), pp. 1193-1242.
  25. Lavy, V., J. Strauss, D. Thomas, and P. de Vreyer (1996): "Quality of Health Care, Survival and Health Outcomes in Ghana", Journal of Health Economics 15, pp. 333-57.
  26. Lee, L., M. Rosenzweig, and M. Pitt (1997): "The Effects of Improved Nutrition, Sanitation, and Water Quality on Child Health in High-Mortality Populations", Journal of Econometrics 77, pp. 209-35.
  27. Megginson, W., R. Nash, and M. van Randenborgh (1994): "The Financial and Operating Performance of Newly Privatized Firms: An Interpretational Empirical Analysis", Journal of Finance 49 (2), pp. 403-52.
  28. Merrick, T. (1985): "The Effect of Piped Water on Early Childhood Mortality in Urban Brazil, 1970 to 1976", Demography 22 (1), pp. 1-24.
  29. Noll, R., M. Shirley and S. Cowan (2000): "Reforming Urban Waster Systems in Developing Countries" in A. Krueger (ed.) Economic Policy Reform: The Second Stage, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  30. Prentice, R. and L. Gloeckler (1978): "Regression Analysis of Grouped Survival Data with Application to Breast Cancer Data", Biometrics 34, pp. 57-67.
  31. Rosenbaum, P. and D. Rubin (1983): "The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects", Biometrika 70, pp. 41-55.
  32. Shirley, M. (2000): "Reforming Urban Water Systems: A Tale of Four Cities" in L. Manzetti (ed.) Regulatory Policy in Latin America: Post Privatization Realities, Coral Gables: North-South Center Press, University of Miami.
  33. Shleifer, A. and R. Vishny (1994): "Politicians and Firms", Quarterly Journal of Economics 109 (4), pp. 995-1025.
  34. Shleifer, A. (1998): "State versus Private Ownership", Journal of Economics Perspectives 12 (4), pp. 133-50.
  35. WHO (2000): Global Water Supply and Sanitation Assessment 2000 Report, Geneva: World Health Organization. WHO (2002a): Children's Health and Environment: A Review of Evidence, Copenhagen: European Environment Agency and World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Galiani, S., Gertler, P., & Schargrodsky, E.
Affiliations
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
  • Universidad Torcuato Di Tella (AR)
Venue
Journal of Political Economy
Published
2005-02
Volume
113
Issue
1
Pages
83-120
ISSN
  • 0022-3808 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-534X
OpenAlex
W2156148770
Cited by
877
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 55 · 2014: 51 · 2013: 49 · 2012: 34
FWCI
214.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Political Economy (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Water Governance and Infrastructure
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Resource Management and Quality
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
Keywords
water privatization, child mortality, water access, water supply, Argentina, municipal water utilities, poverty, infectious and parasitic diseases, cause-specific mortality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review