Cited by 59Urban and Rural Development ChallengesChild Nutrition and Water AccessWater Resource Management and Quality

Water expansions in Shantytowns: health and savings

Open access
GALIANI, SEBASTIAN, GONZALEZ‐ROZADA, MARTIN, SCHARGRODSKY, ERNESTO·2009·Economica

Abstract

This paper examines the effects of the expansion of the water network in urban shantytowns in Argentina. We find large reductions in the presence, frequency and severity of diarrhoea episodes among children reached by network expansions relative to a control group. Moreover, expanded connections induce savings in water expenditures, as these families are able to substitute piped water for more expensive and distant sources of water provision. These health and savings effects are also important for households that previously had clandestine self‐connections to the water network, which were free but of low quality.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1468-0335.2008.00719.x

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Artana, D., F. Navajas, and S. Urbiztondo. 2000. "Governance and Regulation in Argentina." In: W. Savedoff and P. Spiller, eds. Spilled Water. Washington, D.C.: IDB Press.
  2. Galiani, S., P. Gertler, E.Schargrodsky, and F. Sturzenegger. 2005. "The Benefits and Costs of Privatization in Argentina: A Microeconomic Analysis." In: A. Chong and F. Lopez-de- Silanes, eds. Privatization in Latin America-Myths and Reality. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
GALIANI, S., GONZALEZ‐ROZADA, M., & SCHARGRODSKY, E.
Affiliations
Universidad Torcuato Di Tella (AR)
Venue
Economica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-09-17
Volume
76
Issue
304
Pages
607-622
ISSN
  • 0013-0427 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-0335
OpenAlex
W2498471834
Cited by
59
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5
FWCI
11.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Economica (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • Repositorio Digital Universidad Torcuato Di Tella (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban and Rural Development Challenges
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Resource Management and Quality
Keywords
informal settlements, diarrhea, child health, household savings, water supply connection, water quality, water supply infrastructure, Argentina

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review