Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 270

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Metabolic Stoichiometry and the Fate of Excess Carbon and Nutrients in Consumers

Anderson, Thomas R., Hessen, Dag O., Elser, James J., Urabe, Jotaro·2005·The American Naturalist

Abstract

Animals encountering nutritionally imbalanced foods should release elements in excess of requirements in order to maintain overall homeostasis. Quantifying these excesses and predicting their fate is, however, problematic. A new model of the stoichiometry of consumers is formulated that incorporates the separate terms in the metabolic budget, namely, assimilation of ingested substrates and associated costs, protein turnover, other basal costs, such as osmoregulation, and the use of remaining substrates for production. The model indicates that release of excess C and nonlimiting nutrients may often be a significant fraction of the total metabolic budget of animals consuming the nutrient-deficient forages that are common in terrestrial and aquatic systems. The cost of maintenance, in terms of not just C but also N and P, is considerable, such that food quality is important even when intake is low. Many generalist consumers experience short-term and unpredictable fluctuations in their diets. Comparison of model output with data for one such consumer, Daphnia, indicates that mechanisms operating postabsorption in the gut are likely the primary means of regulating excess C, N, and P in these organisms, notably respiration decoupled from biochemical or mechanical work and excretion of carbon and nutrients. This stoichiometrically regulated release may often be in organic rather than inorganic form, with important consequences for the balance of autotrophic and heterotrophic processes in ecosystems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/426598

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 270

Metadata

Authors
Anderson, T. R., Hessen, D. O., Elser, J. J., & Urabe, J.
Venue
The American Naturalist
Published
2005-01
Volume
165
Issue
1
Pages
1-15
ISSN
  • 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5323
OpenAlex
W2061150550
Cited by
270
References
2
FWCI
12.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Metabolic Stoichiometry and the Fate of Excess Carbon and Nutrients in Consumers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/426598
The paper
Anderson, T. R., Hessen, D. O., Elser, J. J., & Urabe, J. (2005). Metabolic Stoichiometry and the Fate of Excess Carbon and Nutrients in Consumers. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/426598

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.