CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 25Gender, Labor, and Family DynamicsYouth Substance Use and School AttendancePoverty, Education, and Child Welfare

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Rethinking welfare school-attendance policies

Campbell, David, Wright, Joan·2005·Social Service Review
DOI 10.1086/426716
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In the late 1990s, a majority of states adopted policies linking welfare cash assistance to satisfactory school attendance. This article summarizes evidence from seven evaluations of school‐attendance requirements prior to the passage of welfare reform in 1996. It also presents a case study of one California county’s postreform program. Programs that fail to accompany sanctions with case management resources do not significantly improve attendance. Further, these programs reinforce the faulty assumption that truancy, rather than illness, is the major cause of attendance problems. However, the use of attendance monitoring to trigger social service interventions has merit.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/426716

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Bardach Eugene, Implementing a Paternalist Welfare‐to‐Work Program
  2. Bos Johannes M, Report
  3. Campbell David, Report to CDSS
  4. Coles Adrienne D, 1997, Education Week, 21, 12
  5. Cunniff James, Report to CDSS
  6. Fein David J, Children Have a School Attendance Problem?
  7. Fein David J, 2001, Lee
  8. Finn Chester E, Paternalism Goes to School
  9. Frye Judith, An Evaluation of Effects of Learnfare Expansion
  10. Frye Judith, An Evaluation of the Learnfare Program: Final Report
  11. Harris Ronald, 2001, Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 28, 211
  12. Katz Michael B, The Price of Citizenship: Redefining America’s Welfare State
  13. King Desmond S, 1999, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  14. Kohn Alfie, Incentive Plans, A’s, Praise, and other Bribes.
  15. Mauldon Jane, Report to CDSS
  16. Maynard Rebecca, 1993, Report. Mathematica Policy Research, Princeton, NJ.
  17. Schaefer Center for Public Policy. 1997., Report
  18. Wilson James Q, Paternalism, Democracy, and Bureaucracy

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 25

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Campbell, D., & Wright, J.
Affiliations
University of California, Davis (US)
ORCID
Campbell, David
Venue
Social Service Review
Publisher
University of Chicago Press
Published
2005-03
Volume
79
Issue
1
Pages
2-28
ISSN
  • 0037-7961 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5404
DOI
10.1086/426716
OpenAlex
W2092591378
Cited by
25
References
17
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Social Service Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Youth Substance Use and School Attendance
  • Social Sciences › Development › Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
Keywords
welfare reform, school attendance requirements, cash transfers, truancy, case management, sanctions, attendance tracking, social service interventions, child welfare policy, program evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review