The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Epochs of Early‐Type Galaxy Formation as a Function of Environment
Open accessAbstract
The aim of this paper is to set constraints on the epochs of early-type galaxy formation through the "archaeology" of the stellar populations in local galaxies. Using our models of absorption-line indices that account for variable abundance ratios, we derive ages, total metallicities, and element ratios of 124 early-type galaxies in high- and low-density environments. The data are analyzed by comparison with mock galaxy samples created through Monte Carlo simulations taking the typical average observational errors into account, in order to eliminate artifacts caused by correlated errors. We find that all three parameters, age, metallicity, and α/Fe ratio, are correlated with velocity dispersion. We show that these results are robust against recent revisions of the local abundance pattern at high metallicities. To recover the observed scatter we need to assume an intrinsic scatter of about 20% in age, 0.08 dex in [ Z /H], and 0.05 dex in [α/Fe]. All low-mass objects with M * ≲ 10 10 M ☉ (σ ≲ 130 km s -1 ) show evidence for the presence of intermediate-age stellar populations with low α/Fe ratios. About 20% of the intermediate-mass objects with 10 10 ≲ M * / M ☉ ≲ 10 11 [110 ≲ σ/(km s -1 ) ≲ 230; both elliptical and lenticular galaxies] must have either a young subpopulation or a blue horizontal branch. On the basis of the above relationships, valid for the bulk of the sample, we show that the Mg-σ relation is mainly driven by metallicity, with similar contributions from the α/Fe ratio (23%) and age (17%). We further find evidence for an influence of the environment on the stellar population properties. Massive early-type galaxies in low-density environments seem on average ~2 Gyr younger and slightly (~0.05-0.1 dex) more metal-rich than their counterparts in high-density environments. No offsets in the α/Fe ratios are instead detected. With the aid of a simple chemical evolution model, we translate the derived ages and α/Fe ratios into star formation histories. We show that most star formation activity in early-type galaxies is expected to have happened between redshifts ~3 and 5 in high-density environments and between redshifts 1 and 2 in low-density environments. We conclude that at least 50% of the total stellar mass density must have already formed at z ~ 1, in good agreement with observational estimates of the total stellar mass density as a function of redshift. Our results suggest that significant mass growth in the early-type galaxy population below z ~ 1 must be restricted to less massive objects, and a significant increase of the stellar mass density between redshifts 1 and 2 should be present, caused mainly by the field galaxy population. The results of this paper further imply the presence of vigorous star formation episodes in massive objects at z ~ 2-5 and evolved elliptical galaxies around z ~ 1, both observationally identified as SCUBA galaxies and extremely red objects, respectively.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Spergel, D. N., Verde, L., Peiris, H. V., Komatsu, E., Nolta, M. R., Bennett, C. L., Halpern, M., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Kogut, A., et al. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/377226 · Cited by 10,976
The Evolution and Explosion of Massive Stars. II. Explosive Hydrodynamics and Nucleosynthesis
Woosley, S. E., & Weaver, T. A. (1995) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/192237 · Cited by 3,761
Cited by
Maraston, C. (2005) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09270.x · Cited by 1,907
Self-citationConroy, C., Gunn, J. E., & White, M. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/699/1/486 · Cited by 1,891
Moresco, M., Pozzetti, L., Cimatti, A., Jimenez, R., Maraston, C., Verde, L., Thomas, D., Citro, A., Tojeiro, R., & Wilkinson, D. (2016) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/05/014 · Cited by 1,182
Self-citationTheoretical Challenges in Galaxy Formation
Naab, T., & Ostriker, J. P. (2017) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-040019 · Cited by 722
Structure and Formation of Elliptical and Spheroidal Galaxies
Bender, R. (2016) · doi:10.15781/t28g8fm0v · Cited by 555
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Thomas, D., Maraston, C., Bender, R., & de Oliveira, C. M.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2005-03-10
- Volume
- 621
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 673-694
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W1985370957
- Cited by
- 1,620
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 54.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Epochs of Early‐Type Galaxy Formation as a Function of Environment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/426932
- The paper
- Thomas, D., Maraston, C., Bender, R., & de Oliveira, C. M. (2005). The Epochs of Early‐Type Galaxy Formation as a Function of Environment. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/426932
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.