The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
IRIS: A New Generation of IRAS Maps
Open accessAbstract
The Infrared Astronomical Satellite ( IRAS ) had a tremendous impact on many areas of modern astrophysics. In particular, it revealed the ubiquity of infrared cirrus that are a spectacular manifestation of the interstellar medium complexity but also an important foreground for observational cosmology. With the forthcoming Planck satellite there is a need for all-sky complementary data sets with arcminute resolution that can bring informations on specific foreground emissions that contaminate the cosmic microwave background radiation. With its ∼4' resolution matching perfectly the high-frequency bands of Planck , IRAS is a natural data set to study the variations of dust properties at all scales. But the latest version of the images delivered by the IRAS team (the ISSA plates) suffer from calibration, zero level, and striping problems that can preclude its use, especially at 12 and 25 μm. In this paper we present how we proceeded to solve each of these problems and enhance significantly the general quality of the ISSA plates in the four bands (12, 25, 60, and 100 μm). This new generation of IRAS images, called IRIS, benefits from a better zodiacal light subtraction, from a calibration and zero level compatible with DIRBE, and from a better destriping. At 100 μm the IRIS product is also a significant improvement from the Schlegel et al. maps. IRIS keeps the full ISSA resolution, it includes well-calibrated point sources, and the diffuse emission calibration at scales smaller than 1° was corrected for the variation of the IRAS detector responsivity with scale and brightness. The uncertainty on the IRIS calibration and zero level is dominated by the uncertainty on the DIRBE calibration and on the accuracy of the zodiacal light model.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., & Davis, M. (1998) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/305772 · Cited by 15,126
Cited by
McDonald, I., Zijlstra, A. A., & Boyer, M. L. (2012) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21873.x · Cited by 271
Planck early results. XXIV. Dust in the diffuse interstellar medium and the Galactic halo
Planck Collaboration, Abergel, A., Ade, P. A. R., Aghanim, N., Arnaud, M., Ashdown, M., Aumont, J., Baccigalupi, C., Balbi, A., Banday, A. J., et al. (2011) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201116485 · Cited by 229
Self-citationViaene, S., Baes, M., Tamm, A., Tempel, E., Bendo, G., Blommaert, J. A. D. L., Boquien, M., Boselli, A., Camps, P., Cooray, A., et al. (2017) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629251 · Cited by 79
Evidence of Fermi bubbles around M31
Pshirkov, M. S., Vasiliev, V. V., & Postnov, K. A. (2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters · doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slw045 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Miville‐Deschenes, M., & Lagache, G.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2005-04
- Volume
- 157
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 302-323
- ISSN
- 0067-0049 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4365
- OpenAlex
- W2071647169
- Cited by
- 499
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 29.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: IRIS: A New Generation of IRAS Maps. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/427938
- The paper
- Miville‐Deschenes, M., & Lagache, G. (2005). IRIS: A New Generation of IRAS Maps. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. https://doi.org/10.1086/427938
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.