Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 368

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Physics of Galaxy Clustering. I. A Model for Subhalo Populations

Open access
Zentner, Andrew R., Berlind, Andreas A., Bullock, James S., Kravtsov, Andrey V., Wechsler, Risa H.·2005·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We present a semianalytic model for cold dark matter halo substructure that can be used as a framework for studying the physics of galaxy formation and as an ingredient in halo models of galaxy clustering. The model has the following main ingredients: (1) extended Press-Schechter mass accretion histories, (2) host halo density profiles computed according to the trends observed in cosmological simulations, (3) distributions of initial orbital parameters of accreting subhalos measured in a high-resolution simulation of three Milky Way-size halos, and (4) integration of the orbital evolution of subhalos including the effects of dynamical friction and tidal mass loss. We perform a comprehensive comparison of the model calculations to the results of a suite of high-resolution cosmological simulations. The comparisons show that subhalo statistics such as the velocity and mass functions, the radial distributions, and the halo occupation distributions agree well over 3 orders of magnitude in host halo mass and at various redshifts. We find that both in the simulations and in our model the radial distributions of subhalos are significantly shallower than that of the dark matter density. The abundance of subhalos in a host is set by competition between tidal disruption and new accretion. Halos of high mass and halos at high redshift tend to host more subhalos because the subhalos have, on average, been accreted more recently. Similarly, at a fixed mass and epoch, halos that formed more recently host a larger number of subhalos. Observed "fossil groups" may represent an extreme tail of this correlation. We find a related correlation between host halo concentration and satellite abundance at fixed host mass, N sat ∝ c , where a changes with redshift and host-to-subhalo mass ratio. Lastly, we use our substructure model to populate host halos in one of the high-resolution cosmological simulations, replacing the actual subhalos resolved in this simulation and using the host mass as the only input for the model calculation. We show that the resulting correlation function of such a hybrid halo ensemble is indistinguishable from that measured directly in the simulation. This supports one of the key tenets of the standard halo model, i.e., the assumption that the halo occupation distribution is statistically independent of the host halo environment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/428898

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 368

Metadata

Authors
Zentner, A. R., Berlind, A. A., Bullock, J. S., Kravtsov, A. V., & Wechsler, R. H.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2005-05-10
Volume
624
Issue
2
Pages
505-525
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2165233299
Cited by
368
References
3
FWCI
21.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Physics of Galaxy Clustering. I. A Model for Subhalo Populations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/428898
The paper
Zentner, A. R., Berlind, A. A., Bullock, J. S., Kravtsov, A. V., & Wechsler, R. H. (2005). The Physics of Galaxy Clustering. I. A Model for Subhalo Populations. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/428898

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.