The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lack of Wall Teichoic Acids in Staphylococcus aureus Leads to Reduced Interactions with Endothelial Cells and to Attenuated Virulence in a Rabbit Model of Endocarditis
Open accessAbstract
Wall teichoic acids (WTAs) are major surface components of gram-positive bacteria that have recently been shown to play a key role in nasal colonization by Staphylococcus aureus. In the present study, we assessed the impact that WTAs have on endovascular infections by using a WTA-deficient S. aureus mutant ( Delta tagO). There were no significant differences detected between the isogenic parental strain (SA113) and the Delta tagO mutant in polymorphonuclear leukocyte-mediated opsonophagocytosis; killing by a prototypic platelet microbicidal protein; or binding to platelets, fibronectin, or fibrinogen. However, compared with the parental strain, the Delta tagO mutant adhered considerably less well to human endothelial cells, especially under flow conditions (70.3% reduction; P<.05). Beads coated with WTA bound to endothelium in a dose-dependent manner, suggesting that WTA contributes specifically to this interaction. These in vitro data closely paralleled those from a rabbit model of infective endocarditis in which the Delta tagO mutant was compared with the parental strain. Clearances of staphylococcus from the bloodstream were equivalent, but the Delta tagO mutant showed a significantly reduced capacity to both colonize sterile cardiac vegetations (P<.05) and proliferate within these vegetations, the kidneys, and the spleen (P<.001). We conclude that WTA is an important factor in the induction and progression of endovascular S. aureus infection, likely through a specific interaction with endothelial cells.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Persistent and Relapsing Infections Associated with Small-Colony Variants of Staphylococcus aureus
Proctor, R. A., van Langevelde, P., Kristjansson, M., Maslow, J. N., & Arbeit, R. D. (1995) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/clinids/20.1.95 · Cited by 437
Cited by
Wall Teichoic Acids of Gram-Positive Bacteria
Brown, S., Santa Maria, J. P., & Walker, S. (2013) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev-micro-092412-155620 · Cited by 966
Howden, B. P., Davies, J. K., Johnson, P. D. R., Stinear, T. P., & Grayson, M. L. (2010) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00042-09 · Cited by 962
Intracellular staphylococcus aureus: Live-in and let die
Fraunholz, M., & Sinha, B. (2012) · Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fcimb.2012.00043 · Cited by 377
The Gram-Positive Bacterial Cell Wall
Rohde, M. (2019) · Microbiology Spectrum · doi:10.1128/microbiolspec.gpp3-0044-2018 · Cited by 319
Synthesis of glycerol phosphate lipoteichoic acid in Staphylococcus aureus
Gründling, A., & Schneewind, O. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0701821104 · Cited by 301
Metadata
- Authors
- Weidenmaier, C., Peschel, A., Xiong, Y., Kristian, S. A., Dietz, K., Yeaman, M. R., & Bayer, A. S.
- Venue
- The Journal of Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-05-15
- Volume
- 191
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1771-1777
- ISSN
- 0022-1899 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-6613
- OpenAlex
- W2150815982
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lack of Wall Teichoic Acids in Staphylococcus aureus Leads to Reduced Interactions with Endothelial Cells and to Attenuated Virulence in a Rabbit Model of Endocarditis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/429692
- The paper
- Weidenmaier, C., Peschel, A., Xiong, Y., Kristian, S. A., Dietz, K., Yeaman, M. R., & Bayer, A. S. (2005). Lack of Wall Teichoic Acids in Staphylococcus aureus Leads to Reduced Interactions with Endothelial Cells and to Attenuated Virulence in a Rabbit Model of Endocarditis. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1086/429692
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.