The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genetic Diversity of Plasmodium falciparum Histidine‐Rich Protein 2 (PfHRP2) and Its Effect on the Performance of PfHRP2‐Based Rapid Diagnostic Tests
Abstract
Rising costs of antimalarial agents are increasing the demand for accurate diagnosis of malaria. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) offer great potential to improve the diagnosis of malaria, particularly in remote areas. Many RDTs are based on the detection of Plasmodium falciparum histidine-rich protein (PfHRP) 2, but reports from field tests have questioned their sensitivity and reliability. We hypothesize that the variability in the results of PfHRP2-based RDTs is related to the variability in the target antigen. We tested this hypothesis by examining the genetic diversity of PfHRP2, which includes numerous amino acid repeats, in 75 P. falciparum lines and isolates originating from 19 countries and testing a subset of parasites by use of 2 PfHRP2-based RDTs. We observed extensive diversity in PfHRP2 sequences, both within and between countries. Logistic regression analysis indicated that 2 types of repeats were predictive of RDT detection sensitivity (87.5% accuracy), with predictions suggesting that only 84% of P. falciparum parasites in the Asia-Pacific region are likely to be detected at densities < or = 250 parasites/microL. Our data also indicated that PfHRP3 may play a role in the performance of PfHRP2-based RDTs. These findings provide an alternative explanation for the variable sensitivity in field tests of malaria RDTs that is not due to the quality of the RDTs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rapid Diagnostic Tests for Malaria Parasites
Moody, A. (2002) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.15.1.66-78.2002 · Cited by 1,418
Cited by
Beshir, K. B., Sepúlveda, N., Bharmal, J., Robinson, A., Mwanguzi, J., Busula, A. O., de Boer, J. G., Sutherland, C., Cunningham, J., & Hopkins, H. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-15031-2 · Cited by 164
Amoah, L. E., Abankwa, J., & Oppong, A. (2016) · Malaria Journal · doi:10.1186/s12936-016-1159-z · Cited by 157
Mayor, A., Moro, L., Aguilar, R., Bardají, A., Cisteró, P., Serra-Casas, E., Sigaúque, B., Alonso, P. L., Ordi, J., & Menéndez, C. (2012) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/cis236 · Cited by 92
Maltha, J., Gillet, P., Bottieau, E., Cnops, L., van Esbroeck, M., & Jacobs, J. (2010) · Malaria Journal · doi:10.1186/1475-2875-9-171 · Cited by 87
Minja, D. T., Schmiegelow, C., Oesterholt, M., Magistrado, P. A., Boström, S., John, D., Pehrson, C., Andersen, D., Deloron, P., Salanti, A., et al. (2012) · Malaria Journal · doi:10.1186/1475-2875-11-211 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Baker, J., McCarthy, J., Gatton, M., Kyle, D. E., Belizario, V., Luchavez, J., Bell, D., & Cheng, Q.
- Venue
- The Journal of Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-09
- Volume
- 192
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 870-877
- ISSN
- 0022-1899 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-6613
- OpenAlex
- W2036927864
- Cited by
- 335
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genetic Diversity of Plasmodium falciparum Histidine‐Rich Protein 2 (PfHRP2) and Its Effect on the Performance of PfHRP2‐Based Rapid Diagnostic Tests. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/432010
- The paper
- Baker, J., McCarthy, J., Gatton, M., Kyle, D. E., Belizario, V., Luchavez, J., Bell, D., & Cheng, Q. (2005). Genetic Diversity of Plasmodium falciparum Histidine‐Rich Protein 2 (PfHRP2) and Its Effect on the Performance of PfHRP2‐Based Rapid Diagnostic Tests. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1086/432010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.