Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 181Psychology of Development and EducationEarly Childhood Education and DevelopmentEgo Development and Educational Practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Research on the Developmental-Task Concept

Havighurst, Robert J.·1956·The School Review

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/442319

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Cited by

See all 181

Metadata

Authors
Havighurst, R. J.
Corresponding author
Havighurst, Robert J.
Venue
The School Review
Published
1956-05
Volume
64
Issue
5
Pages
215-223
ISSN
0036-6773 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2064717834
Cited by
174
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The School Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Psychology of Development and Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Ego Development and Educational Practices
Keywords
developmental tasks, personality development, psychosocial development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Research on the Developmental-Task Concept. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/442319
The paper
Havighurst, R. J. (1956). Research on the Developmental-Task Concept. The School Review. https://doi.org/10.1086/442319

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.