CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 953Gender and Feminist StudiesHistorical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal ChangesDecadence, Literature, and Society

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Black Bodies, White Bodies: Toward an Iconography of Female Sexuality in Late Nineteenth-Century Art, Medicine, and Literature

Gilman, Sander L.·1985·Critical Inquiry
DOI 10.1086/448327
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/448327

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In many, but not all representations, black women's bodies were stigmatized as hypersexual, positioning black women as the moral opposites of pure white women.

    “In many, but not all representations, black women's bodies were also stigmatized as hypersexual, a characterization that positioned black women as the moral opposites of pure white women.”

    From Race, beauty, and the tangled knot of a guilty pleasure (2006) · cites this paper as Gilman, 1985

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Gilman, S. L.
Corresponding author
Gilman, Sander L.
ORCID
Gilman, Sander L.
Venue
Critical Inquiry
Publisher
University of Chicago Press
Published
1985-10
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
204-242
ISSN
  • 0093-1896 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-7858
DOI
10.1086/448327
OpenAlex
W2053060818
Cited by
953
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 60
FWCI
6.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Critical Inquiry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Decadence, Literature, and Society
Keywords
female sexuality, iconography, Black body, white body, late 19th century, art, medicine, literature, race and gender, representation of women
MeSH terms
Art, Literature, Sexual Behavior, History, Modern 1601-

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review