The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
"Folk" Soil Taxonomy and the Partial Adoption of New Seed Varieties
Open accessAbstract
Traditional agricultural systems in less developed countries (LDCs) maintain not only the germplasm of local varieties of ancestral crop populations (landraces) but also the human knowledge and behavioral practices that reflect a long coevolution between crops and human populations. The germplasm of crop landraces provides the material from which high-yielding seed varieties (HYVs) have been developed by international and national agricultural research centers. Farmers' knowledge and behavioral practices, in turn, shape the manner and extent to which these new varieties are adopted and integrated back into the traditional farming system. Although farmers in traditional agricultural systems frequently adopt new seed varieties and other modern inputs, many adopters also continue to cultivate local varieties. High-yielding varieties are introduced into agricultural systems where high levels of crop diversity exist and where different varieties are selected to fill specific ecological (e.g., land-quality) niches. Small farmers in the tropics are often confronted with complex and heterogeneous environments.' A household may own or work several plots, usually scattered in different physiographic zones and made up of different recognized soil qualities.2 Once farmers understand the principal characteristics of new HYVs, usually after a period of observation and experimentation, a "technology equilibrium" is eventually reached.3 This equilibrium may entail the complete displacement of local varieties, but frequently it does not.4 Instead, HYVs may simply be incorporated into one or more agroecological niches on farms. Efforts to explain partial adoption on farms have focused overwhelmingly on considerations of risk and farmer risk aversion.5 How
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adoption of Agricultural Innovations in Developing Countries: A Survey
Feder, G., Just, R. E., & Zilberman, D. (1985) · Economic Development and Cultural Change · doi:10.1086/451461 · Cited by 3,482
Cited by
Crop genetic erosion: understanding and responding to loss of crop diversity
Khoury, C. K., Brush, S., Costich, D. E., Curry, H. A., de Haan, S., Engels, J. M. M., Guarino, L., Hoban, S., Mercer, K. L., Miller, A. J., et al. (2022) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.17733 · Cited by 471
Adoption and intensity of adoption of conservation farming practices in Zambia
Arslan, A., McCarthy, N., Lipper, L., Asfaw, S., & Cattaneo, A. (2014) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2013.08.017 · Cited by 360
Bellon, M. R., Ntandou-Bouzitou, G. D., & Caracciolo, F. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0162535 · Cited by 146
“These farmers may, therefore, face more heterogeneous production environments and need to match their crops or varieties to the appropriate conditions to optimize production [60] thus creating an exogenous incentive to maintain OFD that is independent of consumption decisions.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Bellon, M. R., & Taylor, J. E.
- Venue
- Economic Development and Cultural Change
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1993-07
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 763-786
- ISSN
- 0013-0079 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-2988
- OpenAlex
- W2037561807
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: "Folk" Soil Taxonomy and the Partial Adoption of New Seed Varieties. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/452047
- The paper
- Bellon, M. R., & Taylor, J. E. (1993). "Folk" Soil Taxonomy and the Partial Adoption of New Seed Varieties. Economic Development and Cultural Change. https://doi.org/10.1086/452047
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.