Cited by 146Child Nutrition and Water AccessAgricultural Innovations and PracticesFood Security and Socioeconomic Dynamics

On-farm diversity and market participation are positively associated with dietary diversity of rural mothers in southern Benin, West Africa

Open access
Bellon, Mauricio R., Ntandou-Bouzitou, Gervais D., Caracciolo, Francesco·2016·PLoS ONE

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to test the extent to which, under different opportunities for market participation, the diversity of plant species rural households grow or collect (on-farm diversity), and the variety of foods mothers purchase (market diversity) are associated with their dietary diversity. METHODS: Rural households from three districts in southern Benin were interviewed during dry (n = 472) and wet (n = 482) seasons between 2011 and 2012. Villages within districts and their households were selected randomly according to market accessibility, with a mother selected from each household. Information on on-farm diversity was collected using a semi-structured questionnaire. Market diversity was obtained through a 7-day food frequency questionnaire that elicited if foods were purchased. Dietary diversity was derived from a quantitative 24-hour food recall. A system of three simultaneous equations via a Generalized Methods of Moments was estimated to address potential endogeneity between dietary diversity and on-farm diversity and market diversity. RESULTS: Results show rich on-farm diversity with more than 65 different edible plant species grown or collected by households. More than 70% of foods consumed by mothers were purchased in 55 market places. More than 50% of mothers met minimum dietary diversity with at least 5 food groups consumed. Diagnostic tests indicated the existence of endogeneity. Econometric results showed that on-farm and market diversities were positively associated with mothers' dietary diversity (p < 0.05) once market opportunities, seasonality and other socioeconomic factors were controlled for. CONCLUSION: Results provide evidence of a positive relationship between on-farm diversity and dietary diversity among participant mothers. They demonstrate the important contribution of market diversity to their dietary diversity. Links among these three facets of diversity suggest that production for self-consumption and food purchases complement rather than replace each other in their contribution to dietary diversity and thus dietary quality.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0162535

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [20]Singh L, Squire L, Strauss J. Agricultural household models. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1986.
  2. [55]Hayashi F. Econometrics. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2000.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bellon, M. R., Ntandou-Bouzitou, G. D., & Caracciolo, F.
Affiliations
  • Alliance Bioversity International - CIAT (IT)
  • University of Naples Federico II (IT)
Corresponding author
Bellon, Mauricio R.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2016-09-08
Volume
11
Issue
9
Pages
e0162535
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2515600722
Cited by
146
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8
FWCI
11.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP53227)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Security and Socioeconomic Dynamics
Keywords
on-farm diversity, market diversity, dietary diversity, rural households, mothers, food purchasing, market participation, food security, self-consumption, endogeneity, seasonal variation, southern Benin
MeSH terms
Farms, Adolescent, Adult, Benin, Child, Preschool, Diet, Family Characteristics, Food Supply, Humans, Infant, Middle Aged, Models, Theoretical, Mothers, Rural Population, Models, Econometric, Marketing, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review