The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of a Cooperative Learning Approach in Reading and Writing on Academically Handicapped and Nonhandicapped Students
Abstract
A 2-year study was conducted to determine the long-term effects of a comprehensive cooperative learning approach to elementary reading and language arts instruction on students' achievement, attitudes, and metacognitive awareness. In the Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition (CIRC) program, students in second through sixth grade worked in heterogeneous learning teams on reading and writing activities related to stories they were reading. Teachers provided students with explicit instruction on comprehension strategies and used a writing process approach to teach writing and language arts. The study also mainstreamed academically handicapped students in regular classes, and these students were active participants in the cooperative learning team activities. In the study 635 students at 3 elementary schools using the CIRC program were compared to 664 students at 4 matched schools that used traditional instruction. The 72 academically handicapped students at the CIRC schools were mainstreamed in CIRC and compared to 65 students in pull-out programs in the control schools. The first-year results showed that CIRC students had significantly higher achievement in reading vocabulary and reading comprehension. Second-year results indicated that CIRC students had significantly higher achievement in vocabulary, comprehension, and language expression. The CIRC students also exhibited greater metacognitive awareness than did their peers. Academically handicapped students who were mainstreamed in CIRC classes had significantly higher achievement in reading vocabulary, reading comprehension, and language expression than did comparable special education students taught in traditional settings. There were no significant effects on students' attitudes toward reading or writing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the Craft of Reading, Writing and Mathematics
Collins, A., Brown, J. S., Newman, S. E., & Montclair State University (1988) · Thinking: The Journal of Philosophy for Children · doi:10.5840/thinking19888129 · Cited by 1,299
Cited by
Seidel, T., & Shavelson, R. J. (2007) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654307310317 · Cited by 1,259
Slavin, R. E. (2008) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x08314117 · Cited by 560
Self-citationEffective Programs in Elementary Mathematics: A Best-Evidence Synthesis
Slavin, R. E., & Lake, C. (2008) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654308317473 · Cited by 407
Self-citationEffective programs for struggling readers: A best-evidence synthesis
Slavin, R. E., Lake, C., Davis, S., & Madden, N. A. (2011) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2010.07.002 · Cited by 353
Self-citationCooperative learning in elementary schools
Slavin, R. E. (2015) · Education 3-13 · doi:10.1080/03004279.2015.963370 · Cited by 297
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Stevens, R. J., & Slavin, R. E.
- Venue
- The Elementary School Journal
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1995-01
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 241-262
- ISSN
- 0013-5984 (ISSN-L)
- 1554-8279
- OpenAlex
- W2084949578
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of a Cooperative Learning Approach in Reading and Writing on Academically Handicapped and Nonhandicapped Students. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/461801
- The paper
- Stevens, R. J., & Slavin, R. E. (1995). Effects of a Cooperative Learning Approach in Reading and Writing on Academically Handicapped and Nonhandicapped Students. The Elementary School Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/461801
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.