The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Vimalakīrti and Gentry Buddhism
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Not only this scripture had a strong impact on Buddhist thought, it also deeply influenced philosophy, literature and the visual arts 62”
From The Vimalakīrtinirdeśa Commentary [T1775] by Sengzhao et alii and the Chinese Conquest of Buddhism (2019) · cites this paper as Mather 1968
In the citing paper
“The”
From The Vimalakīrtinirdeśa Commentary [T1775] by Sengzhao et alii and the Chinese Conquest of Buddhism (2019) · cites this paper as Mather 1968
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Vimalakīrtinirdeśa Commentary [T1775] by Sengzhao et alii and the Chinese Conquest of Buddhism
Baggio, G. (2019) · doi:10.33612/diss.94589377 · Cited by 1
Contextualizing Buddhist Approaches to Religious Diversity
Zhiru, S. (2013) · Religious Diversity in Chinese Thought · doi:10.1057/9781137318503_7
Metadata
- Authors
- Mather, R. B.
- Corresponding author
- Mather, Richard B.
- Venue
- History of Religions
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1968-08
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 60-73
- ISSN
- 0018-2710 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-6935
- OpenAlex
- W2085629595
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- History of Religions (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
- Keywords
- Vimalakirti, Chinese Buddhism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vimalakīrti and Gentry Buddhism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/462575
- The paper
- Mather, R. B. (1968). Vimalakīrti and Gentry Buddhism. History of Religions. https://doi.org/10.1086/462575