Cited by 24Indian and Buddhist StudiesStudy and Philosophy of ReligionBiblical Studies and Interpretation

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Mahāsāṃghika Origins: The Beginnings of Buddhist Sectarianism

Nattier, Janice J., Prebish, Charles S.·1977·History of Religions

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/462767

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 24

Metadata

Authors
Nattier, J. J., & Prebish, C. S.
Venue
History of Religions
Published
1977-02
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
237-272
ISSN
  • 0018-2710 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-6935
OpenAlex
W2021609403
Cited by
24
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
History of Religions (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
Keywords
Buddhist sectarianism, early Buddhism, Buddhist monasticism, origins of Buddhism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review