Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 902

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Theoretical Models of the Halo Occupation Distribution: Separating Central and Satellite Galaxies

Open access
Zheng, Zheng, Berlind, Andreas A., Weinberg, David H., Benson, Andrew J., Baugh, Carlton M., Cole, Shaun, Dave, Romeel, Frenk, Carlos S., Katz, Neal, Lacey, Cedric G.·2005·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

The halo occupation distribution (HOD) describes the relation between galaxies and dark matter at the level of individual dark matter halos. The properties of galaxies residing at the centers of halos differ from those of satellite galaxies because of differences in their formation histories. Using a smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) simulation and a semianalytic (SA) galaxy formation model, we examine the separate contributions of central and satellite galaxies to the HOD, more specifically to the probability P ( N | M ) that a halo of virial mass M contains N galaxies of a particular class. In agreement with earlier results for dark matter subhalos, we find that the mean occupation function ⟨ N ⟩ M for galaxies above a baryonic mass threshold can be approximated by a step function for central galaxies plus a power law for satellites and that the distribution of satellite numbers is close to Poisson at fixed halo mass. Since the number of central galaxies is always zero or one, the width of P ( N | M ) is narrower than a Poisson distribution at low N and approaches Poisson at high N . For galaxy samples defined by different baryonic mass thresholds, there is a nearly linear relation between the minimum halo mass M min required to host a central galaxy and the mass M 1 at which an average halo hosts one satellite, with M 1 ≈ 14 M min (SPH) or M 1 ≈ 18 M min (SA). The stellar population age of central galaxies correlates with halo mass, and this correlation explains much of the age dependence of the galaxy HOD. The mean occupation number of young galaxies exhibits a local minimum at M ~ 10 M min where halos are too massive to host a young central galaxy but not massive enough to host satellites. Using the SA model, we show that the conditional galaxy mass function at fixed halo mass cannot be described by a Schechter function because central galaxies produce a "bump" at high masses. We suggest parameterizations for the HOD and the conditional luminosity function that can be used to model observed galaxy clustering. Many of our predictions are in good agreement with recent results inferred from clustering in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/466510

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 902

Metadata

Authors
Zheng, Z., Berlind, A. A., Weinberg, D. H., Benson, A. J., Baugh, C. M., Cole, S., Dave, R., Frenk, C. S., Katz, N., & Lacey, C. G.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2005-11-10
Volume
633
Issue
2
Pages
791-809
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2000310419
Cited by
902
References
1
FWCI
15.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Theoretical Models of the Halo Occupation Distribution: Separating Central and Satellite Galaxies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/466510
The paper
Zheng, Z., Berlind, A. A., Weinberg, D. H., Benson, A. J., Baugh, C. M., Cole, S., Dave, R., Frenk, C. S., Katz, N., & Lacey, C. G. (2005). Theoretical Models of the Halo Occupation Distribution: Separating Central and Satellite Galaxies. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/466510

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.