The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Entitlements, Rights, and Fairness: An Experimental Examination of Subjects' Concepts of Distributive Justice
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fairness and the assumptions of economics
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1986) · The Journal of Business · doi:10.1086/296367 · Cited by 2,463
The Grammar of Society: The Nature and Dynamics of Social Norms
Bicchieri, C. (2005) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511616037 · Cited by 1,991
2. Public Goods: A Survey of Experimental Research
Ledyard, J. O. (1995) · The Handbook of Experimental Economics · doi:10.1515/9780691213255-004 · Cited by 1,033
Dictator game giving: Rules of fairness versus acts of kindness.
Bolton, G. E., Katok, E., & Zwick, R. (1998) · International Journal of Game Theory · doi:10.1007/s001820050072 · Cited by 480
Güth, W., & Tietz, R. (1990) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/0167-4870(90)90021-z · Cited by 396
Metadata
- Authors
- Hoffman, E., & Spitzer, M. L.
- Venue
- The Journal of Legal Studies
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1985-06
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 259-297
- ISSN
- 0047-2530 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5366
- OpenAlex
- W1984409801
- Cited by
- 663
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 35.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Entitlements, Rights, and Fairness: An Experimental Examination of Subjects' Concepts of Distributive Justice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/467773
- The paper
- Hoffman, E., & Spitzer, M. L. (1985). Entitlements, Rights, and Fairness: An Experimental Examination of Subjects' Concepts of Distributive Justice. The Journal of Legal Studies. https://doi.org/10.1086/467773
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
