Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 276

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Model‐independent Multivariable Gamma‐Ray Burst Luminosity Indicator and Its Possible Cosmological Implications

Open access
Liang, Enwei, Zhang, Bing·2005·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

Without imposing any theoretical models and assumptions, we present a multivariable regression analysis to several observable quantities for a sample of 15 gamma-ray bursts (GRBs). The observables used in the analysis include the isotropic gamma-ray energy ( E γ,iso ), the peak energy of the ν F ν spectrum in the rest frame ( E ), and the rest-frame break time of the optical afterglow light curves ( t ). A strong dependence of E γ,iso on E and t is derived, which reads E γ,iso /10 52 ergs = (0.85 ± 0.21)( E /100 keV) 1.94±0.17 ( t /1 day) -1.24±0.23 in a flat universe with Ω M = 0.28 and H 0 = 71.3 km s -1 Mpc -1 . We also extend the analysis to the isotropic afterglow energies in the X-ray and optical bands, respectively, and find that they are essentially not correlated with E and t . Regarding the E γ,iso relationship as a luminosity indicator, we explore the possible constraints on the cosmological parameters using the GRB sample. Since there is no low-redshift GRB sample to calibrate this relationship, we weight the probability of using the relationship in each cosmology to serve as a standard candle by χ 2 statistics and then use this cosmology-weighted standard candle to evaluate cosmological parameters. Our results indicate that 0.05 < Ω M < 0.50 at the 1 σ level, with the most probable value of Ω M being 0.28. The best value of Ω Λ is 0.64, but it is less constrained. Only a loose limit of Ω Λ < 1.2 is obtained at the 1 σ level. In the case of a flat universe, the 1 σ constraints are 0.13 < Ω M < 0.49 and 0.50 < Ω Λ < 0.85, respectively. The deceleration factor ( q ) and its cosmological evolution ( dq / dz ) are also investigated with an evolutionary form of q = q 0 + z dq / dz . The best-fit values are ( q 0 , dq / dz ) = (-1.00, 1.12), with -2.23 < q 0 < 0.26 and -0.07 < dq / dz < 3.48 at the 1 σ level. The inferred transition redshift between the deceleration and acceleration phases is 0.78 (1 σ). Through Monte Carlo simulations, we find that the GRB sample satisfying our relationship observationally tends to be a soft and bright one and that the constraints on the cosmological parameters can be much improved either by enlarging the sample size or by increasing the observational precision. Although the sample may not expand significantly in the Swift era, a significant increase of the sample is expected in the long-term future. Our simulations indicate that with a sample of 50 GRBs satisfying our multivariable standard candle, one can achieve a constraint to the cosmological parameters comparable to that derived from 157 Type Ia supernovae. Furthermore, the detections of a few high-redshift GRBs satisfying the correlation could greatly tighten the constraints. Identifying high- z GRBs and measuring their E and t are therefore essential for the GRB cosmology in the Swift era.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/491594

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 276

Metadata

Authors
Liang, E., & Zhang, B.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2005-11-10
Volume
633
Issue
2
Pages
611-623
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2148992883
Cited by
276
References
4
FWCI
14.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Model‐independent Multivariable Gamma‐Ray Burst Luminosity Indicator and Its Possible Cosmological Implications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/491594
The paper
Liang, E., & Zhang, B. (2005). Model‐independent Multivariable Gamma‐Ray Burst Luminosity Indicator and Its Possible Cosmological Implications. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/491594

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.