The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Model‐independent Multivariable Gamma‐Ray Burst Luminosity Indicator and Its Possible Cosmological Implications
Open accessAbstract
Without imposing any theoretical models and assumptions, we present a multivariable regression analysis to several observable quantities for a sample of 15 gamma-ray bursts (GRBs). The observables used in the analysis include the isotropic gamma-ray energy ( E γ,iso ), the peak energy of the ν F ν spectrum in the rest frame ( E ), and the rest-frame break time of the optical afterglow light curves ( t ). A strong dependence of E γ,iso on E and t is derived, which reads E γ,iso /10 52 ergs = (0.85 ± 0.21)( E /100 keV) 1.94±0.17 ( t /1 day) -1.24±0.23 in a flat universe with Ω M = 0.28 and H 0 = 71.3 km s -1 Mpc -1 . We also extend the analysis to the isotropic afterglow energies in the X-ray and optical bands, respectively, and find that they are essentially not correlated with E and t . Regarding the E γ,iso relationship as a luminosity indicator, we explore the possible constraints on the cosmological parameters using the GRB sample. Since there is no low-redshift GRB sample to calibrate this relationship, we weight the probability of using the relationship in each cosmology to serve as a standard candle by χ 2 statistics and then use this cosmology-weighted standard candle to evaluate cosmological parameters. Our results indicate that 0.05 < Ω M < 0.50 at the 1 σ level, with the most probable value of Ω M being 0.28. The best value of Ω Λ is 0.64, but it is less constrained. Only a loose limit of Ω Λ < 1.2 is obtained at the 1 σ level. In the case of a flat universe, the 1 σ constraints are 0.13 < Ω M < 0.49 and 0.50 < Ω Λ < 0.85, respectively. The deceleration factor ( q ) and its cosmological evolution ( dq / dz ) are also investigated with an evolutionary form of q = q 0 + z dq / dz . The best-fit values are ( q 0 , dq / dz ) = (-1.00, 1.12), with -2.23 < q 0 < 0.26 and -0.07 < dq / dz < 3.48 at the 1 σ level. The inferred transition redshift between the deceleration and acceleration phases is 0.78 (1 σ). Through Monte Carlo simulations, we find that the GRB sample satisfying our relationship observationally tends to be a soft and bright one and that the constraints on the cosmological parameters can be much improved either by enlarging the sample size or by increasing the observational precision. Although the sample may not expand significantly in the Swift era, a significant increase of the sample is expected in the long-term future. Our simulations indicate that with a sample of 50 GRBs satisfying our multivariable standard candle, one can achieve a constraint to the cosmological parameters comparable to that derived from 157 Type Ia supernovae. Furthermore, the detections of a few high-redshift GRBs satisfying the correlation could greatly tighten the constraints. Identifying high- z GRBs and measuring their E and t are therefore essential for the GRB cosmology in the Swift era.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant
Riess, A. G., Filippenko, A. V., Challis, P., Clocchiatti, A., Diercks, A., Garnavich, P. M., Gilliland, R. L., Hogan, C. J., Jha, S., Kirshner, R. P., et al. (1998) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/300499 · Cited by 19,704
Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 High‐Redshift Supernovae
Perlmutter, S., Aldering, G., Goldhaber, G., Knop, R. A., Nugent, P., Castro, P. G., Deustua, S., Fabbro, S., Goobar, A., Groom, D. E., et al. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/307221 · Cited by 18,062
Spergel, D. N., Verde, L., Peiris, H. V., Komatsu, E., Nolta, M. R., Bennett, C. L., Halpern, M., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Kogut, A., et al. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/377226 · Cited by 10,976
Riess, A. G., Strolger, L., Tonry, J., Casertano, S., Ferguson, H. C., Mobasher, B., Challis, P., Filippenko, A. V., Jha, S., Li, W., et al. (2004) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/383612 · Cited by 4,315 · cited 2×
“Following Riess et al. (2004), we also take q(z) = q0 + zdq/dz to analyze the implications for q0 and dq/dz from the current GRB sample.”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Cited by
The physics of gamma-ray bursts & relativistic jets
Kumar, P., & Zhang, B. (2015) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.09.008 · Cited by 952
Self-citationButler, N. R., Kocevski, D., Bloom, J. S., & Curtis, J. L. (2007) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/522492 · Cited by 278
Liang, E.-W., Yi, S.-X., Zhang, J., Lü, H.-J., Zhang, B.-B., & Zhang, B. (2010) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/725/2/2209 · Cited by 256
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Liang, E., & Zhang, B.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2005-11-10
- Volume
- 633
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 611-623
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2148992883
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 14.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Model‐independent Multivariable Gamma‐Ray Burst Luminosity Indicator and Its Possible Cosmological Implications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/491594
- The paper
- Liang, E., & Zhang, B. (2005). Model‐independent Multivariable Gamma‐Ray Burst Luminosity Indicator and Its Possible Cosmological Implications. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/491594
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.