Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 278

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Complete Catalog of Swift Gamma‐Ray Burst Spectra and Durations: Demise of a Physical Origin for Pre‐Swift High‐Energy Correlations

Open access
Butler, Nathaniel R., Kocevski, Daniel, Bloom, Joshua S., Curtis, Jason L.·2007·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We calculate durations and spectral parameters for 218 Swift bursts detected by the BAT instrument between and including gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) 041220 and 070509, including 77 events with measured redshifts. Incorporating prior knowledge into the spectral fits, we are able to measure the characteristic ν F ν spectral peak energy E pk, obs and the isotropic equivalent energy E iso (1-10 4 keV) for all events. This complete and rather extensive catalog, analyzed with a unified methodology, allows us to address the persistence and origin of high-energy correlations suggested in pre- Swift observations. We find that the E pk, obs - E iso correlation is present in the Swift sample; however, the best-fit power-law relation is inconsistent with the best-fit pre- Swift relation at >5 σ significance. It has a factor ≳2 larger intrinsic scatter, after accounting for large errors on E pk, obs . A large fraction of the Swift events are hard and subluminous relative to (and inconsistent with) the pre- Swift relation, in agreement with indications from BATSE GRBs without redshift. Moreover, we determine an experimental threshold for the BAT detector and show how the E pk, obs - E iso correlation arises artificially due to partial correlation with the threshold. We show that pre- Swift correlations found by Amati et al., Yonetoku et al., and Firmani et al., and independently by others are likely unrelated to the physical properties of GRBs and are likely useless for tests of cosmology. Also, an explanation for these correlations in terms of a detector threshold provides a natural and quantitative explanation for why short-duration GRBs and events at low redshift tend to be outliers to the correlations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/522492

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 47 references

Cited by

See all 278

Metadata

Authors
Butler, N. R., Kocevski, D., Bloom, J. S., & Curtis, J. L.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2007-12-10
Volume
671
Issue
1
Pages
656-677
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2091910256
Cited by
278
References
47
FWCI
16.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Complete Catalog of Swift Gamma‐Ray Burst Spectra and Durations: Demise of a Physical Origin for Pre‐Swift High‐Energy Correlations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/522492
The paper
Butler, N. R., Kocevski, D., Bloom, J. S., & Curtis, J. L. (2007). A Complete Catalog of Swift Gamma‐Ray Burst Spectra and Durations: Demise of a Physical Origin for Pre‐Swift High‐Energy Correlations. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/522492

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.