The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Geomorphic Controls on Andean Denudation Rates
Abstract
To predict erosion rates throughout the Andes, we conducted a multiple regression analysis of the sediment discharge from 47 drainage basins in the Bolivian Andes and various topographic, climatologic, and geologic parameters. These mountainous basins are typically large (17–81,000 km2; $$\mathrm{mean}\,=11,000$$ km2), often have decades of measurement data on daily water and sediment discharge, and display an extraordinary range of denudation (0.01–6.9 mm/yr), runoff (16–2700 mm/yr), and local topographic relief (700–4300 m), yet the underlying lithology (granitic plutons, metasediments, and Quaternary deposits) can be classified into a small number of homogeneous types, and anthropogenic disturbance is limited. The steep nature of the channels precludes sediment storage, and unlike previous global studies of fluvial denudation rates, based on data compilations from very large river basins (>100,000 km2), this analysis distinguishes the sediment production in mountains from sediment entrapment within adjacent sedimentary basins. Lithology and average catchment slope account for 90% of the variance in sediment yield, and yield is not significantly correlated with runoff. However, because runoff over geologic timescales orchestrates the processes of channel network incision and sediment evacuation, climate could ultimately govern basin hillslope conditions and thereby the rates of hillslope erosion. Several theoretical geomorphic models for mass wasting are tested to assess hillslope‐scale sediment yield models for the study basins. When applied throughout the Amazonian Andes, such empirical models predict an annual Andean sediment flux to the lowland Amazon Basin of 2.3–3.1 Gt. Because ∼1.3 Gt/yr of sediment reach the gauged tributaries of the mainstem Amazon River, the intervening foreland basins appear to intercept about half of the total Andean sediment discharge.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Amazonia Through Time: Andean Uplift, Climate Change, Landscape Evolution, and Biodiversity
Hoorn, C., Wesselingh, F. P., ter Steege, H., Bermudez, M. A., Mora, A., Sevink, J., Sanmartín, I., Sanchez-Meseguer, A., Anderson, C. L., Figueiredo, J. P., et al. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1194585 · Cited by 2,404
Expression of active tectonics in erosional landscapes
Kirby, E., & Whipple, K. X. (2012) · Journal of Structural Geology · doi:10.1016/j.jsg.2012.07.009 · Cited by 1,093
Roering, J. J., Kirchner, J. W., & Dietrich, W. E. (1999) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/1998wr900090 · Cited by 705
Whipple, K. X., DiBiase, R. A., & Crosby, B. T. (2013) · Treatise on Geomorphology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-374739-6.00254-2 · Cited by 190
Metadata
- Authors
- Aalto, R., Dunne, T., & Guyot, J. L.
- Venue
- The Journal of Geology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 85-99
- ISSN
- 0022-1376 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5269
- OpenAlex
- W2041532132
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Geomorphic Controls on Andean Denudation Rates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/498101
- The paper
- Aalto, R., Dunne, T., & Guyot, J. L. (2006). Geomorphic Controls on Andean Denudation Rates. The Journal of Geology. https://doi.org/10.1086/498101
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.