The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Welfare State Paradox: State Interventions and Women’s Employment Opportunities in 22 Countries
Abstract
This study explores the role played by the welfare state in affecting women’s labor force participation and occupational achievement. Using data from 22 industrialized countries, the authors examine the consequences of state interventions for both women’s employment patterns and gender inequality in occupational attainment. The findings reveal a twofold effect: developed welfare states facilitate women’s access into the labor force but not into powerful and desirable positions. Specifically, nations characterized by progressive and developed welfare policies and by a large public service sector tend to have high levels of female labor force participation, along with a high concentration of women in female‐typed occupations and low female representation in managerial occupations. The findings provide insights into the social mechanisms underlying the relations between welfare states’ benefits to working mothers and women’s participation and achievements in the labor market.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cotter, D. A., Hermsen, J. M., Ovadia, S., & Vanneman, R. (2001) · Social Forces · doi:10.1353/sof.2001.0091 · Cited by 894 · cited 1×
“Following other studies that have dealt with the glass ceiling (i.e., Dulepp and Sanders 1992; Wright, Baxter, and Birkelund 1995; Athey, Avery, and Zemksy 2000; Cotter et al. 2001) in this study we empirically define “powerful” or “high-level” positions as management positions.”
Investigation of human mitochondrial myopathies by phosphorus magnetic resonance spectroscopy
Arnold, D. L., Taylor, D. J., & Radda, G. K. (1985) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.410180205 · Cited by 266
Cited by
Work and family research in the first decade of the 21st century
Bianchi, S. M., & Milkie, M. A. (2010) · Journal of Marriage and Family · doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00726.x · Cited by 1,145
Indulging Our Gendered Selves? Sex Segregation by Field of Study in 44 Countries
Charles, M., & Bradley, K. (2009) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/595942 · Cited by 996
Gangl, M., & Ziefle, A. (2009) · Demography · doi:10.1353/dem.0.0056 · Cited by 588
Employment Regimes and the Quality of Work
(2007) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230105.001.0001 · Cited by 468
Thébaud, S. (2015) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0001839215591627 · Cited by 419
Metadata
- Authors
- Mandel, H., & Semyonov, M.
- Venue
- American Journal of Sociology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2006-05
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1910-1949
- ISSN
- 0002-9602 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5390
- OpenAlex
- W2115703300
- Cited by
- 647
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 65.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Welfare State Paradox: State Interventions and Women’s Employment Opportunities in 22 Countries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/499912
- The paper
- Mandel, H., & Semyonov, M. (2006). A Welfare State Paradox: State Interventions and Women’s Employment Opportunities in 22 Countries. American Journal of Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1086/499912
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.