The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Costs and Outcomes Among Hemodialysis-Dependent Patients With Methicillin-Resistant or Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia
Abstract
Objective: Comorbid conditions have complicated previous analyses of the consequences of methicillin resistance for costs and outcomes of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. We compared costs and outcomes of methicillin resistance in patients with S. aureus bacteremia and a single chronic condition. Design, Setting, and Patients: We conducted a prospective cohort study of hemodialysis-dependent patients with end-stage renal disease and S. aureus bacteremia hospitalized between July 1996 and August 2001. We used propensity scores to reduce bias when comparing patients with methicillin-resistant (MRSA) and methicillin-susceptible (MSSA)S. aureus bacteremia. Outcome measures were resource use, direct medical costs, and clinical outcomes at 12 weeks after initial hospitalization. Results: Fifty-four patients (37.8%) had MRSA and 89 patients (62.2%) had MSSA. Compared with patients with MSSA bacteremia, patients with MRSA bacteremia were more likely to have acquired the infection while hospitalized for another condition (27.8% vs 12.4%;P= .02). To attribute all inpatient costs to S. aureus bacteremia, we limited the analysis to 105 patients admitted for suspected S. aureus bacteremia from a community setting. Adjusted costs were higher for MRSA bacteremia for the initial hospitalization ($21,251 vs $13,978;P= .012) and after 12 weeks ($25,518 vs $17,354;P= .015). At 12 weeks, patients with MRSA bacteremia were more likely to die (adjusted odds ratio, 5.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.5 to 18.7) than were patients with MSSA bacteremia. Conclusions: Community-dwelling, hemodialysis-dependent patients hospitalized with MRSA bacteremia face a higher mortality risk, longer hospital stays, and higher inpatient costs than do patients with MSSA bacteremia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Management of multidrug-resistant organisms in health care settings, 2006
Siegel, J. D., Rhinehart, E., Jackson, M., & Chiarello, L. (2007) · American Journal of Infection Control · doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2007.10.006 · Cited by 1,283
Cosgrove, S. E. (2006) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/499406 · Cited by 1,271
Pathogenesis of Methicillin‐Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infection
Gordon, R. J., & Lowy, F. D. (2008) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/533591 · Cited by 961
Patel, G., Huprikar, S., Factor, S. H., Jenkins, S. G., & Calfee, D. P. (2008) · Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology · doi:10.1086/592412 · Cited by 836
Köck, R., Becker, K., Cookson, B., van Gemert-Pijnen, J. E., Harbarth, S., Kluytmans, J., Mielke, M., Peters, G., Skov, R. L., Struelens, M. J., et al. (2010) · Eurosurveillance · doi:10.2807/ese.15.41.19688-en · Cited by 611
Metadata
- Authors
- Reed, S. D., Friedman, J. Y., Engemann, J. J., Griffiths, R. I., Anstrom, K. J., Kaye, K. S., Stryjewski, M. E., Szczech, L. A., Reller, L. B., Corey, G. R., Schulman, K. A., & Fowler, V. G.
- Venue
- Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2005-02
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 175-183
- ISSN
- 0899-823X (ISSN-L)
- 1559-6834
- OpenAlex
- W2081380761
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Costs and Outcomes Among Hemodialysis-Dependent Patients With Methicillin-Resistant or Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/502523
- The paper
- Reed, S. D., Friedman, J. Y., Engemann, J. J., Griffiths, R. I., Anstrom, K. J., Kaye, K. S., Stryjewski, M. E., Szczech, L. A., Reller, L. B., Corey, G. R., Schulman, K. A., & Fowler, V. G. (2005). Costs and Outcomes Among Hemodialysis-Dependent Patients With Methicillin-Resistant or Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1086/502523
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.