Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 254

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Postexposure Protection of Guinea Pigs against a Lethal Ebola Virus Challenge Is Conferred by RNA Interference

Open access
Geisbert, Thomas W., Hensley, Lisa E., Kagan, Elliott, Yu, Erik Zhaoying, Geisbert, Joan B., Daddario‐DiCaprio, Kathleen, Fritz, Elizabeth A., Jahrling, Peter B., McClintock, Kevin, Phelps, Janet R., Lee, Amy C. H., Judge, Adam, Jeffs, Lloyd B., MacLachlan, Ian·2006·The Journal of Infectious Diseases

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ebola virus (EBOV) infection causes a frequently fatal hemorrhagic fever (HF) that is refractory to treatment with currently available antiviral therapeutics. RNA interference represents a powerful, naturally occurring biological strategy for the inhibition of gene expression and has demonstrated utility in the inhibition of viral replication. Here, we describe the development of a potential therapy for EBOV infection that is based on small interfering RNAs (siRNAs). METHODS: Four siRNAs targeting the polymerase (L) gene of the Zaire species of EBOV (ZEBOV) were either complexed with polyethylenimine (PEI) or formulated in stable nucleic acid-lipid particles (SNALPs). Guinea pigs were treated with these siRNAs either before or after lethal ZEBOV challenge. RESULTS: Treatment of guinea pigs with a pool of the L gene-specific siRNAs delivered by PEI polyplexes reduced plasma viremia levels and partially protected the animals from death when administered shortly before the ZEBOV challenge. Evaluation of the same pool of siRNAs delivered using SNALPs proved that this system was more efficacious, as it completely protected guinea pigs against viremia and death when administered shortly after the ZEBOV challenge. Additional experiments showed that 1 of the 4 siRNAs alone could completely protect guinea pigs from a lethal ZEBOV challenge. CONCLUSIONS: Further development of this technology has the potential to yield effective treatments for EBOV HF as well as for diseases caused by other agents that are considered to be biological threats.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/504267

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 254

Metadata

Authors
Geisbert, T. W., Hensley, L. E., Kagan, E., Yu, E. Z., Geisbert, J. B., Daddario‐DiCaprio, K., Fritz, E. A., Jahrling, P. B., McClintock, K., Phelps, J. R., Lee, A. C. H., Judge, A., Jeffs, L. B., & MacLachlan, I.
Venue
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
Published
2006-06-15
Volume
193
Issue
12
Pages
1650-1657
ISSN
  • 0022-1899 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6613
OpenAlex
W2105364677
Cited by
254
References
2
FWCI
13.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Postexposure Protection of Guinea Pigs against a Lethal Ebola Virus Challenge Is Conferred by RNA Interference. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/504267
The paper
Geisbert, T. W., Hensley, L. E., Kagan, E., Yu, E. Z., Geisbert, J. B., Daddario‐DiCaprio, K., Fritz, E. A., Jahrling, P. B., McClintock, K., Phelps, J. R., Lee, A. C. H., Judge, A., Jeffs, L. B., & MacLachlan, I. (2006). Postexposure Protection of Guinea Pigs against a Lethal Ebola Virus Challenge Is Conferred by RNA Interference. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1086/504267

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.