The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Simulating Radiating and Magnetized Flows in Multiple Dimensions with ZEUS‐MP
Open accessAbstract
This paper describes ZEUS-MP, a multiphysics, massively parallel, message-passing implementation of the ZEUS code. ZEUS-MP differs significantly from the thoroughly documented ZEUS-2D code, the completely undocumented (in peer-reviewed literature) ZEUS-3D code, and a marginally documented "version 1" of ZEUS-MP first distributed publicly in 1999. ZEUS-MP offers an MHD algorithm that is better suited for multidimensional flows than the ZEUS-2D module by virtue of modifications to the method of characteristics scheme first suggested by Hawley & Stone. This MHD module is shown to compare quite favorably to the TVD scheme described by Ryu et al. ZEUS-MP is the first publicly available ZEUS code to allow the advection of multiple chemical (or nuclear) species. Radiation hydrodynamic simulations are enabled via an implicit flux-limited radiation diffusion (FLD) module. The hydrodynamic, MHD, and FLD modules can be used, singly or in concert, in one, two, or three space dimensions. In addition, so-called 1.5D and 2.5D grids, in which the "half-D" denotes a symmetry axis along which a constant but nonzero value of velocity or magnetic field is evolved, are supported. Self-gravity can be included either through the assumption of a GM / r potential or through a solution of Poisson's equation using one of three linear solver packages (conjugate gradient, multigrid, and FFT) provided for that purpose. Point-mass potentials are also supported. Because ZEUS-MP is designed for large simulations on parallel computing platforms, considerable attention is paid to the parallel performance characteristics of each module in the code. Strong-scaling tests involving pure hydrodynamics (with and without self-gravity), MHD, and RHD are performed in which large problems (256 3 zones) are distributed among as many as 1024 processors of an IBM SP3. Parallel efficiency is a strong function of the amount of communication required between processors in a given algorithm, but all modules are shown to scale well on up to 1024 processors for the chosen fixed problem size.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Design and Implementation of FFTW3
Frigo, M., & Johnson, S. G. (2005) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2004.840301 · Cited by 5,086
Physics of shock waves and high-temperature hydrodynamic phenomena
(1970) · Journal of Molecular Structure · doi:10.1016/0022-2860(70)90019-0 · Cited by 4,222
Templates for the Solution of Linear Systems: Building Blocks for Iterative Methods
Barrett, R., Berry, M., Chan, T. F., Demmel, J., Donato, J., Dongarra, J., Eijkhout, V., Pozo, R., Romine, C., & van der Vorst, H. (1994) · Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks · doi:10.1137/1.9781611971538 · Cited by 3,479
Multi-level adaptive solutions to boundary-value problems
Brandt, A. (1977) · Mathematics of Computation · doi:10.1090/s0025-5718-1977-0431719-x · Cited by 3,357
Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. IV. A new approach to numerical convection
Van Leer, B. (1977) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1016/0021-9991(77)90095-x · Cited by 2,433
A Method for the Numerical Calculation of Hydrodynamic Shocks
VonNeumann, J., & Richtmyer, R. D. (1950) · Journal of Applied Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1699639 · Cited by 2,248
Similarity and Dimensional Methods in Mechanics
(1959) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2013-0-08173-x · Cited by 2,029
Stone, J. M., & Norman, M. L. (1992) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/191680 · Cited by 1,461
Self-citationFoundations of Radiation Hydrodynamics
Mihalas, D., & Mihalas, B. W. (1985) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 1,381
Physics of Shock Waves and High-Temperature Hydrodynamic Phenomena
Zel’dovich, Y. B., Raǐzer, Y. P., Hayes, W. D., et al. (2002) · Cited by 1,210
Cited by
Glover, S. C. O., & Low, M.-M. M. (2011) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17907.x · Cited by 258
FERMI BUBBLES INFLATED BY WINDS LAUNCHED FROM THE HOT ACCRETION FLOW IN SGR A*
Mou, G., Yuan, F., Bu, D., Sun, M., & Su, M. (2014) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/790/2/109 · Cited by 97
“Simulation Setup We use ZEUS code (Stone & Norman 1992; Hayes et al. 2006), and adopt 3-”
MethodAsymmetric eROSITA bubbles as the evidence of a circumgalactic medium wind
Mou, G., Sun, D., Fang, T., Wang, W., Zhang, R., Yuan, F., Sofue, Y., Wang, T., & He, Z. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-36478-0 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Hayes, J. C., Norman, M. L., Fiedler, R. A., Bordner, J. O., Li, P. S., Clark, S. E., ud‐Doula, A., & Mac Low, M.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2006-07
- Volume
- 165
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 188-228
- ISSN
- 0067-0049 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4365
- OpenAlex
- W2109074901
- Cited by
- 317
- References
- 22
- FWCI
- 20.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Simulating Radiating and Magnetized Flows in Multiple Dimensions with ZEUS‐MP. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/504594
- The paper
- Hayes, J. C., Norman, M. L., Fiedler, R. A., Bordner, J. O., Li, P. S., Clark, S. E., ud‐Doula, A., & Mac Low, M. (2006). Simulating Radiating and Magnetized Flows in Multiple Dimensions with ZEUS‐MP. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. https://doi.org/10.1086/504594
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.