Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 258

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

On the relationship between molecular hydrogen and carbon monoxide abundances in molecular clouds: H2 versus CO abundance

Open access
Glover, S. C. O., Low, M.-M. Mac·2011·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

The most usual tracer of molecular gas is line emission from CO. However, the reliability of this tracer has long been questioned in environments different from the Milky Way. We study the relationship between H2 and CO abundances using a fully dynamical model of magnetized turbulence coupled to a chemical network simplified to follow only the dominant pathways for H2 and CO formation and destruction, and including photodissociation using a six-ray approximation. We find that the abundance of H2 is primarily determined by the amount of time available for its formation, which is proportional to the product of the density and the metallicity, but insensitive to photodissociation. Photodissociation only becomes important at extinctions under a few tenths of a visual magnitude, in agreement with both observational and prior theoretical work. On the other hand, CO forms quickly, within a dynamical time, but its abundance depends primarily on photodissociation, with only a weak secondary dependence on H2 abundance. As a result, there is a sharp cut-off in CO abundance at mean visual extinctions AV≲ 3. At lower values of AV, we find that the ratio of H2 column density to CO emissivity XCO∝A−3.5V. This explains the discrepancy observed in low metallicity systems between cloud masses derived from CO observations and other techniques such as infrared emission. Our work predicts that CO-bright clouds in low metallicity systems should be systematically larger or denser than Milky Way clouds, or both. Our results further explain the narrow range of observed molecular cloud column densities as a threshold effect, without requiring the assumption of virial equilibrium.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17907.x

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 34 references

Cited by

See all 258

Metadata

Authors
Glover, S. C. O., & Low, M.-M. M.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2011-02-02
Volume
412
Issue
1
Pages
337-350
ISSN
0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1818884880
Cited by
258
References
34
FWCI
16.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the relationship between molecular hydrogen and carbon monoxide abundances in molecular clouds: H2 versus CO abundance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17907.x
The paper
Glover, S. C. O., & Low, M.-M. M. (2011). On the relationship between molecular hydrogen and carbon monoxide abundances in molecular clouds: H2 versus CO abundance. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17907.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.