Cited by 124Bacterial Infections and VaccinesMicrobial infections and disease researchNeonatal and Maternal Infections

Increased Case‐Fatality Rate Associated with Outbreaks of Neisseria meningitidis Infection, Compared with Sporadic Meningococcal Disease, in the United States, 1994–2002

Brooks, Richard, Woods, Christopher W., Benjamin, Jr., Daniel K., Rosenstein, Nancy E.·2006·Clinical Infectious Diseases

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Outbreaks of meningococcal disease are infrequent but important public health events. We characterize outbreak-associated cases in the United States and compare them with sporadic disease. METHODS: Outbreaks of meningococcal disease that occurred during the period of 1 July 1994 through 30 June 2002 were identified through state health departments, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention records, and a review of newspapers and the medical literature. Cases associated with outbreaks were compared with sporadic cases identified through population-based surveillance. RESULTS: We identified 69 outbreaks of Neisseria meningitidis infection (median, 9.5 outbreaks per year; range, 3-14 outbreaks per year), which involved 229 patients from 30 states. Forty-three (62%) of the outbreaks involved N. meningitidis serogroup C, 17 (25%) involved serogroup B, and 9 (13%) involved serogroup Y. Twenty-five outbreaks (36%) occurred in communities, and 44 (64%) were organization based, including 12 that occurred in colleges and universities, 19 that occurred in primary and secondary schools, and 8 that occurred in nursing homes. Vaccination campaigns (with the A/C/Y/W-135 meningococcal polysaccharide vaccine) were conducted for 31 outbreaks (28 involving serogroup C and 3 involving serogroup Y). After controlling for age, serogroup, and clinical presentation, outbreak-associated cases were associated with a higher case-fatality rate than were sporadic cases (21% vs. 11%; odds ratio, 3.3; 95% confidence interval, 2.0-5.5). CONCLUSIONS: Outbreaks remain an important but infrequent public health issue, representing <2% of all cases of meningococcal disease. However, given the increased case-fatality rate found among outbreak-related cases of N. meningitidis infection, additional investigation of factors that favor the transmission and virulence of outbreak-related strains is warranted.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/504804

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For all serogroups, outbreaks of meningococcal meningitis are associated with higher case-fatality ratios than sporadic cases.

    “For all serogroups, outbreaks of meningococcal meningitis are associated with higher case-fatality ratios than sporadic cases.21”

    From Community-acquired acute bacterial meningitis in adults: a clinical update (2019) · cites this paper as [21]

    Results (Table 3; page not provided) show higher observed case-fatality rates for outbreak-associated than sporadic cases in serogroups C, B, and Y. But the differences for B and Y are statistically uncertain, there were no outbreak-associated W-135 cases, and the meningitis-specific comparison (13% vs. 10%) is also uncertain. The claim overstates the evidence by saying this holds for all serogroups of meningococcal meningitis. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Rosenstein NE, Perkins BA, Stephens DS, Popovic T, Hughes JM. Me- ningococcal disease. N Engl J Med 2001; 344:1378-88.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brooks, R., Woods, C. W., Benjamin, Jr., & Rosenstein, N. E.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Corresponding author
Woods, Christopher W.
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
2006-07
Volume
43
Issue
1
Pages
49-54
ISSN
  • 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6591
OpenAlex
W2148145446
Cited by
124
References
15
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 5
FWCI
6.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Sanofi
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Microbial infections and disease research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Neonatal and Maternal Infections
Keywords
Neisseria meningitidis, meningococcal disease outbreak, case fatality rate, serogroup C, serogroup B, serogroup Y, community outbreak, nursing home outbreak, meningococcal polysaccharide vaccine, vaccination campaigns, United States
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Child, Child, Preschool, Disease Outbreaks, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Meningococcal Infections, Middle Aged, Mortality, Neisseria meningitidis, Population Surveillance, Retrospective Studies, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review