Cited by 105Astronomy and Astrophysical ResearchCalibration and Measurement TechniquesStellar, planetary, and galactic studies

Toward 1% Photometry: End‐to‐End Calibration of Astronomical Telescopes and Detectors

Open access
Stubbs, Christopher W., Tonry, John L.·2006·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We review the systematic uncertainties that have plagued attempts to obtain high precision and high accuracy from ground-based photometric measurements using CCDs. We identify two main challenges in breaking through the 1% precision barrier: (1) fully characterizing atmospheric transmission, along the instrument's line of sight, and (2) properly identifying, measuring, and removing instrumental artifacts. We discuss approximations and limitations inherent in the present methodology, and we estimate their contributions to systematic photometric uncertainties. We propose an alternative conceptual scheme for the relative calibration of astronomical apparatus: the availability of calibrated detectors whose relative spectral sensitivity is known to better than one part in 10 3 opens up the possibility of in situ relative throughput measurements, normalized to a precision calibrated detector, using a stable but uncalibrated narrowband light source. An implementation scheme is outlined, which exploits the availability of tunable lasers to map out the relative wavelength response of an imaging system, using a flat-field screen and a calibrated reference photodiode. The merits and limitations of this scheme are discussed. In tandem with careful measurements of atmospheric transmission, this approach could potentially lead to reliable ground-based photometry with fractional uncertainties below the percent level.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/505138

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The quality of exposures in large campaigns remains essential to downstream tasks such as astrometric and photometric measurements and target selection.

    “Despite the increase in scope and complexity of future imaging surveys, the quality of exposures in large campaigns will remain essential to downstream tasks, such as astrometric (e.g., Lang et al. 2009), and photometric (e.g., Stubbs & Tonry 2006) measurements, and target selection to facilitate follow-up studies (e.g., Myers et al. 2023).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Adelman, S. I., Gulliver, A. F., & Holmgren, D. E. 1996, in ASP Conf. Ser. 108, MASS: Model Atmospheres and Spectrum Synthesis, ed. S. J. Adelman, F. Kupka, & W. W. Weiss (San Francisco: ASP), 293
  2. Borucki, W. J., et al. 2003, Proc. SPIE, 4854, 129
  3. Cuillandre, J.-C., Magnier, E. A., Isani, S., Sabin, D., Knight, W., Kraus, S., & Lai, K. 2002, Proc. SPIE, 4844, 501
  4. Houghton, J. T. 1977, The Physics of Atmospheres (London: Cambridge Univ. Press)
  5. Marshall, J. L., & DePoy, D. L. 2005, preprint (astro-ph/0510233) · arXiv
  6. Slater, P. N. 1980, Remote Sensing: Optics and Optical Systems (London: Addison Wesley)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stubbs, C. W., & Tonry, J. L.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2006-08
Volume
646
Issue
2
Pages
1436-1444
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W1996912798
Cited by
105
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Calibration and Measurement Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Keywords
photometric calibration, atmospheric transmission, instrumental artifacts, CCD detector, tunable lasers, ground-based photometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review