Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 439

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Galaxies in the Hubble Ultra Deep Field. I. Detection, Multiband Photometry, Photometric Redshifts, and Morphology

Open access
Coe, Dan, Benítez, Narciso, Sánchez, Sebastián F., Jee, Myungkook, Bouwens, Rychard, Ford, Holland·2006·The Astronomical Journal

Abstract

We present aperture-matched point-spread function (PSF)-corrected BVi ' z ' JH photometry and Bayesian photometric redshifts (BPZ) for objects detected in the Hubble Ultra Deep Field (UDF), 8042 of which are detected at the 10 σ level (e.g., i ' < 29.01 or z ' < 28.43). Most of our objects are defined identically to those in the public STScI catalogs, enabling a straightforward object-by-object comparison. We have combined detections from i ', z ', J + H , and B + V + i ' + z ' images into a single comprehensive segmentation map. Using a new program called SExSeg, we are able to force this segmentation map into SExtractor for photometric analysis. The resulting photometry is corrected for the wider NIC3 PSFs using our ColorPro software. We also correct for the ACS z '-band PSF halo. Offsets are applied to our NIC3 magnitudes, which are found to be too faint relative to the ACS fluxes. Based on BPZ spectral energy distribution (SED) fits to objects of known spectroscopic redshift, we derived corrections of -0.30 ± 0.03 mag in J and -0.18 ± 0.04 mag in H . Our offsets appear to be supported by a recent recalibration of the UDF NIC3 images combined with nonlinearity measured in NICMOS itself. The UDF reveals a large population of faint blue galaxies (presumably young starbursts), bluer than those observed in the original Hubble Deep Fields. To accommodate these galaxies, we have added two new starburst templates to the SED library used in previous BPZ papers. The resulting photometric redshifts are accurate to within 0.04(1 + z spec ) out to z < 6. Our BPZ results include a full redshift probability distribution for each galaxy. By adding these distributions, we obtain the redshift probability histogram for galaxies in the UDF. Median redshifts are also provided for different magnitude-limited samples. Finally, we measure galaxy morphology, including Sérsic index and asymmetry. Simulations allow us to quantify the reliability of our morphological results. Our full catalog, along with our software packages SExSeg and ColorPro, is available from our ACS Web site.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/505530

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 439

Metadata

Authors
Coe, D., Benítez, N., Sánchez, S. F., Jee, M., Bouwens, R., & Ford, H.
Venue
The Astronomical Journal
Published
2006-07-10
Volume
132
Issue
2
Pages
926-959
ISSN
  • 0004-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-3881
OpenAlex
W2001330031
Cited by
439
References
1
FWCI
13.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Galaxies in the Hubble Ultra Deep Field. I. Detection, Multiband Photometry, Photometric Redshifts, and Morphology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/505530
The paper
Coe, D., Benítez, N., Sánchez, S. F., Jee, M., Bouwens, R., & Ford, H. (2006). Galaxies in the Hubble Ultra Deep Field. I. Detection, Multiband Photometry, Photometric Redshifts, and Morphology. The Astronomical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/505530

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.