The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A New Robust Low‐Scatter X‐Ray Mass Indicator for Clusters of Galaxies
Open accessAbstract
We present a comparison of X-ray proxies for the total cluster mass, M 500 , including the spectral temperature ( T X ), gas mass measured within r 500 ( M g ,500 ), and the new proxy, Y X , which is a simple product of T X and M g ,500 and is related to the total thermal energy of the ICM. We use mock Chandra images constructed for a sample of clusters simulated with the Eulerian N -body+gasdynamics adaptive mesh refinement ART code in the concordance ΛCDM cosmology. The simulations achieve high spatial and mass resolution and include radiative cooling, star formation, and other processes accompanying galaxy formation. Our analysis shows that simulated clusters exhibit a high degree of regularity and tight correlations between the considered observables and total mass. The normalizations of the M 500 - T X , M g ,500 - T X , and M 500 - Y X relations agree to better than ≈10%-15% with the current observational measurements of these relations. Our results show that Y X is the best mass proxy with a remarkably low scatter of only ≈5%-7% in M 500 for a fixed Y X , at both low and high redshifts and regardless of whether clusters are relaxed or not. In addition, we show that redshift evolution of the Y X - M 500 relation is close to the self-similar prediction, which makes Y X a very attractive mass indicator for measurements of the cluster mass function from X-ray-selected samples.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Spergel, D. N., Verde, L., Peiris, H. V., Komatsu, E., Nolta, M. R., Bennett, C. L., Halpern, M., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Kogut, A., et al. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/377226 · Cited by 10,976
Cited by
Dunkley, J., Komatsu, E., Nolta, M. R., Spergel, D. N., Larson, D., Hinshaw, G., Page, L., Bennett, C. L., Gold, B., Jarosik, N., et al. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/180/2/306 · Cited by 1,787
CHANDRA CLUSTER COSMOLOGY PROJECT III: COSMOLOGICAL PARAMETER CONSTRAINTS
Vikhlinin, A., Kravtsov, A. V., Burenin, R. A., Ebeling, H., Forman, W. R., Hornstrup, A., Jones, C., Murray, S. S., Nagai, D., Quintana, H., et al. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/692/2/1060 · Cited by 1,080
Self-citationTHE LARGE-SCALE BIAS OF DARK MATTER HALOS: NUMERICAL CALIBRATION AND MODEL TESTS
Tinker, J. L., Robertson, B. E., Kravtsov, A. V., Klypin, A., Warren, M. S., Yepes, G., & Gottlöber, S. (2010) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/724/2/878 · Cited by 989
Self-citationArnaud, M., Pratt, G. W., Piffaretti, R., Böhringer, H., Croston, J. H., & Pointecouteau, E. (2010) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200913416 · Cited by 954
Kravtsov, A. V., & Borgani, S. (2012) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125502 · Cited by 870
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kravtsov, A. V., Vikhlinin, A., & Nagai, D.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2006-10-10
- Volume
- 650
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 128-136
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2096825304
- Cited by
- 496
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A New Robust Low‐Scatter X‐Ray Mass Indicator for Clusters of Galaxies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/506319
- The paper
- Kravtsov, A. V., Vikhlinin, A., & Nagai, D. (2006). A New Robust Low‐Scatter X‐Ray Mass Indicator for Clusters of Galaxies. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/506319
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.