The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
THE LARGE-SCALE BIAS OF DARK MATTER HALOS: NUMERICAL CALIBRATION AND MODEL TESTS
Open accessAbstract
We measure the clustering of dark matter halos in a large set of collisionless cosmological simulations of the flat ΛCDM cosmology. Halos are identified using the spherical overdensity algorithm, which finds the mass around isolated peaks in the density field such that the mean density is Δ times the background. We calibrate fitting functions for the large-scale bias that are adaptable to any value of Δ we examine. We find a ∼6% scatter about our best-fit bias relation. Our fitting functions couple to the halo mass functions of Tinker et al. such that the bias of all dark matter is normalized to unity. We demonstrate that the bias of massive, rare halos is higher than that predicted in the modified ellipsoidal collapse model of Sheth et al. and approaches the predictions of the spherical collapse model for the rarest halos. Halo bias results based on friends-of-friends halos identified with linking length 0.2 are systematically lower than for halos with the canonical Δ = 200 overdensity by ∼10%. In contrast to our previous results on the mass function, we find that the universal bias function evolves very weakly with redshift, if at all. We use our numerical results, both for the mass function and the bias relation, to test the peak-background split model for halo bias. We find that the peak-background split achieves a reasonable agreement with the numerical results, but ∼20% residuals remain, both at high and low masses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Spergel, D. N., Verde, L., Peiris, H. V., Komatsu, E., Nolta, M. R., Bennett, C. L., Halpern, M., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Kogut, A., et al. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/377226 · Cited by 10,976
The Structure of Cold Dark Matter Halos
Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. (1996) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/177173 · Cited by 8,544 · cited 1×
“…Between Values of ∆ One method of obtaining halo statistics at various values of ∆ is to assume that halos are described by the density profile of Navarro et al. (1996) (hereafter NFW) and calculate the change in mass between the desired∆ and some fiducial value at which the mass function or…”
MethodThe cosmological simulation code gadget-2
Springel, V. (2005) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09655.x · Cited by 6,368
Formation of Galaxies and Clusters of Galaxies by Self-Similar Gravitational Condensation
Press, W. H., & Schechter, P. (1974) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/152650 · Cited by 4,916
The evolution of large-scale structure in a universe dominated by cold dark matter
Davis, M., Efstathiou, G., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. (1985) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/163168 · Cited by 3,391
The statistics of peaks of Gaussian random fields
Bardeen, J. M., Bond, J. R., Kaiser, N., & Szalay, A. S. (1986) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/164143 · Cited by 3,270
Large-scale bias and the peak background split
Sheth, R. K., & Tormen, G. (1999) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02692.x · Cited by 2,783
Profiles of dark haloes: evolution, scatter and environment
Bullock, J. S., Kolatt, T. S., Sigad, Y., Somerville, R. S., Kravtsov, A. V., Klypin, A. A., Primack, J. R., & Dekel, A. (2001) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04068.x · Cited by 2,319
Self-citationToward a Halo Mass Function for Precision Cosmology: The Limits of Universality
Tinker, J., Kravtsov, A. V., Klypin, A., Abazajian, K., Warren, M., Yepes, G., Gottlöber, S., & Holz, D. E. (2008) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/591439 · Cited by 1,819
Self-citationSheth, R. K., Mo, H. J., & Tormen, G. (2001) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04006.x · Cited by 1,807
Cited by
KiDS-450: cosmological parameter constraints from tomographic weak gravitational lensing
Hildebrandt, H., Viola, M., Heymans, C., Joudaki, S., Kuijken, K., Blake, C., Erben, T., Joachimi, B., Klaes, D., Miller, L., et al. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2805 · Cited by 1,021
The Dark Energy Survey: more than dark energy – an overview
(2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw641 · Cited by 1,019
Cosmology with cosmic shear observations: a review
Kilbinger, M. (2015) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/78/8/086901 · Cited by 604
Planck 2013 results. XVII. Gravitational lensing by large-scale structure
Planck Collaboration, Ade, P. A. R., Aghanim, N., Armitage-Caplan, C., Arnaud, M., Ashdown, M., Atrio-Barandela, F., Aumont, J., Baccigalupi, C., Banday, A. J., et al. (2014) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321543 · Cited by 391
de la Torre, S., Jullo, E., Giocoli, C., Pezzotta, A., Bel, J., Granett, B. R., Guzzo, L., Garilli, B., Scodeggio, M., Bolzonella, M., et al. (2017) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201630276 · Cited by 99
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Tinker, J. L., Robertson, B. E., Kravtsov, A. V., Klypin, A., Warren, M. S., Yepes, G., & Gottlöber, S.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2010-11-09
- Volume
- 724
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 878-886
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2133534993
- Cited by
- 989
- References
- 63
- FWCI
- 18.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE LARGE-SCALE BIAS OF DARK MATTER HALOS: NUMERICAL CALIBRATION AND MODEL TESTS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/724/2/878
- The paper
- Tinker, J. L., Robertson, B. E., Kravtsov, A. V., Klypin, A., Warren, M. S., Yepes, G., & Gottlöber, S. (2010). THE LARGE-SCALE BIAS OF DARK MATTER HALOS: NUMERICAL CALIBRATION AND MODEL TESTS. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/724/2/878
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
