The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Afterglow, Energetics, and Host Galaxy of the Short‐Hard Gamma‐Ray Burst 051221a
Open accessAbstract
We present detailed optical, X-ray, and radio observations of the bright afterglow of the short gamma-ray burst 051221a obtained with Gemini, Swift XRT, and the Very Large Array, as well as optical spectra from which we measure the redshift of the burst, z = 0.5464. At this redshift the isotropic-equivalent prompt energy release was about 1.5 × 10 51 ergs, and using a standard afterglow synchrotron model, we find that the blast wave kinetic energy is similar, E K ,iso ≈ 8.4 × 10 51 ergs. An observed jet break at t ≈ 5 days indicates that the opening angle is θ j ≈ 7° and the total beaming-corrected energy is therefore ≈2.5 × 10 49 ergs, comparable to the values inferred for previous short GRBs. We further show that the burst experienced an episode of energy injection by a factor of 3.4 between t = 1.4 and 3.4 hr, which was accompanied by reverse shock emission in the radio band. This result provides continued evidence that the central engines of short GRBs may be active significantly longer than the duration of the burst and/or produce a wide range of Lorentz factors. Finally, we show that the host galaxy is actively forming stars at a rate of about 1.6 M ☉ yr -1 , yet exhibits evidence for an appreciable population of old stars (~1 Gyr) and near-solar metallicity. These properties are intermediate between those of long GRB hosts and previous short burst hosts. The lack of bright supernova emission and the low circumburst density ( n ~ 10 -3 cm -3 ), however, continue to support the idea that short bursts are not related to massive stellar death. Given that the total energy release is larger than the predicted yield for a neutrino annihilation mechanism, this suggests that magnetohydrodynamic processes may be required to power the burst.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., & Davis, M. (1998) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/305772 · Cited by 15,126
Electromagnetic extraction of energy from Kerr black holes
Blandford, R. D., & Znajek, R. L. (1977) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/179.3.433 · Cited by 5,116
Cited by
The physics of gamma-ray bursts & relativistic jets
Kumar, P., & Zhang, B. (2015) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.09.008 · Cited by 952
Gamma-Ray Bursts in the Swift Era
Gehrels, N., Ramirez-Ruiz, E., & Fox, D. B. (2009) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145147 · Cited by 615
Self-citationBauswein, A., Goriely, S., & Janka, H.-T. (2013) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/773/1/78 · Cited by 567
Fong, W., Berger, E., Margutti, R., & Zauderer, B. A. (2015) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/815/2/102 · Cited by 532
Self-citationWHAT IS THE MOST PROMISING ELECTROMAGNETIC COUNTERPART OF A NEUTRON STAR BINARY MERGER?
Metzger, B. D., & Berger, E. (2012) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/746/1/48 · Cited by 521
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Soderberg, A. M., Berger, E., Kasliwal, M., Frail, D. A., Price, P. A., Schmidt, B. P., Kulkarni, S. R., Fox, D. B., Cenko, S. B., Gal‐Yam, A., Nakar, E., & Roth, K. C.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2006-10-10
- Volume
- 650
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 261-271
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2150299296
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Afterglow, Energetics, and Host Galaxy of the Short‐Hard Gamma‐Ray Burst 051221a. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/506429
- The paper
- Soderberg, A. M., Berger, E., Kasliwal, M., Frail, D. A., Price, P. A., Schmidt, B. P., Kulkarni, S. R., Fox, D. B., Cenko, S. B., Gal‐Yam, A., Nakar, E., & Roth, K. C. (2006). The Afterglow, Energetics, and Host Galaxy of the Short‐Hard Gamma‐Ray Burst 051221a. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/506429
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.