The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Global Evolution of Giant Molecular Clouds. I. Model Formulation and Quasi‐Equilibrium Behavior
Open accessAbstract
We present semianalytic dynamical models for giant molecular clouds evolving under the influence of H II regions launched by newborn star clusters. In contrast to previous work, we neither assume that clouds are in virial or energetic equilibrium, nor do we ignore the effects of star formation feedback. The clouds, which we treat as spherical, can expand and contract homologously. Photoionization drives mass ejection; the recoil of cloud material both stirs turbulent motions and leads to an effective confining pressure. The balance between these effects and the decay of turbulent motions through isothermal shocks determines clouds' dynamical and energetic evolution. We find that for realistic values of the rates of turbulent dissipation, photoevaporation, and energy injection by H II regions, the massive clouds where most molecular gas in the Galaxy resides live for a few crossing times, in good agreement with recent observational estimates that large clouds in Local Group galaxies survive roughly 20-30 Myr. During this time clouds remain close to equilibrium, with virial parameters of 1-3 and column densities near 10 22 H atoms cm -2 , also in agreement with observed cloud properties. Over their lives they convert 5%-10% of their mass into stars, after which point most clouds are destroyed when a large H II region unbinds them. In contrast, small clouds like those found in the solar neighborhood only survive ~1 crossing time before being destroyed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Theoretical Challenges in Galaxy Formation
Naab, T., & Ostriker, J. P. (2017) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-040019 · Cited by 722
Krumholz, M. R., Dekel, A., & McKee, C. F. (2012) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/745/1/69 · Cited by 526
Self-citationHow do massive black holes get their gas?
Hopkins, P. F., & Quataert, E. (2010) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17064.x · Cited by 503
Murray, N., Quataert, E., & Thompson, T. A. (2010) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/709/1/191 · Cited by 476
Global hierarchical collapse in molecular clouds. Towards a comprehensive scenario
Vázquez-Semadeni, E., Palau, A., Ballesteros-Paredes, J., Gómez, G. C., & Zamora-Avilés, M. (2019) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2736 · Cited by 361
Metadata
- Authors
- Krumholz, M. R., Matzner, C. D., & McKee, C. F.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2006-12-10
- Volume
- 653
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 361-382
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2073845444
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Global Evolution of Giant Molecular Clouds. I. Model Formulation and Quasi‐Equilibrium Behavior. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/508679
- The paper
- Krumholz, M. R., Matzner, C. D., & McKee, C. F. (2006). The Global Evolution of Giant Molecular Clouds. I. Model Formulation and Quasi‐Equilibrium Behavior. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/508679
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.