The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
THE DISRUPTION OF GIANT MOLECULAR CLOUDS BY RADIATION PRESSURE & THE EFFICIENCY OF STAR FORMATION IN GALAXIES
Open accessAbstract
Star formation is slow in the sense that the gas consumption time is much longer than the dynamical time. It is also inefficient; star formation in local galaxies takes place in giant molecular clouds (GMCs), but the fraction of a GMC converted to stars is very small, GMC ∼ 5%. In luminous starbursts, the GMC lifetime is shorter than the main-sequence lifetime of even the most massive stars, so that supernovae can play no role in GMC disruption. We investigate the disruption of GMCs across a wide range of galaxies from normal spirals to the densest starbursts; we take into account the effects of H ii gas pressure, shocked stellar winds, protostellar jets, and radiation pressure produced by the absorption and scattering of starlight on dust grains. In the Milky Way, a combination of three mechanisms—jets, H ii gas pressure, and radiation pressure—disrupts the clouds. In more rapidly star-forming galaxies such as "clump" galaxies at high-redshift, ultra-luminous infrared galaxies (ULIRGs), and submillimeter galaxies, radiation pressure dominates natal cloud disruption. We predict the presence of ∼10–20 clusters with masses ∼10 7 M ☉ in local ULIRGs such as Arp 220 and a similar number of clusters with M * ∼ 10 8 M ☉ in high redshift clump galaxies; submillimeter galaxies will have even more massive clusters. We find that GMC = π G Σ GMC c /(2( L / M * )) for GMCs that are optically thin to far-infrared radiation, where Σ GMC is the GMC gas surface density. The efficiency in optically thick systems continues to increase with Σ GMC , but more slowly, reaching ∼35% in the most luminous starbursts. The disruption of bubbles by radiation pressure stirs the interstellar medium (ISM) to velocities of ∼10 km s −1 in normal galaxies and to ∼100 km s −1 in ULIRGs like Arp 220, consistent with observations. Thus, radiation pressure may play a dominant dynamical role in the ISM of star-forming galaxies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Catalog of Parameters for Globular Clusters in the Milky Way
Harris, W. E. (1996) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/118116 · Cited by 4,500 · cited 1×
“30Myr) and old (& 30Myr) clusters in M51 with masses in the range 103 − 106M⊙ (Scheepmaker et al. 2007), for super star clusters in M82 withMcl = 105 − 4× 106M⊙ (McCrady et al. 2003; McCrady & Graham 2007), and in globular clusters with masses∼ 105 − 106M⊙ (Harris 1996).”
BackgroundMcKee, C. F., & Ostriker, J. P. (1977) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/155667 · Cited by 2,082 · cited 1×
“…massive stars, depositi n of momentum by expanding bubbles of photoionized HII region gas, deposition of momentum by the shocked winds from massive stars, and jets from protostars (e.g., McKee & Ostriker 1977; Silk 1997; Wada & Norman 2001; Matzner 2002; Li & Nakamura 2006; Cunningham et al. 2008).”
BackgroundTHE STAR FORMATION EFFICIENCY IN NEARBY GALAXIES: MEASURING WHERE GAS FORMS STARS EFFECTIVELY
Leroy, A. K., Walter, F., Brinks, E., Bigiel, F., de Blok, W. J. G., Madore, B., & Thornley, M. D. (2008) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-6256/136/6/2782 · Cited by 1,919
Interstellar bubbles. II - Structure and evolution
Weaver, R., McCray, R., Castor, J., Shapiro, P., & Moore, R. (1977) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/155692 · Cited by 1,736 · cited 1×
“Much of the literature on bubbles around massive stars and massive star clusters assumes that shocked stellar winds dominate the dynamics (e.g., Castor et al. 1975; Weaver et al. 1977; Chu & Mac Low 1990).”
BackgroundCastor, J., Weaver, R., & McCray, R. (1975) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/181908 · Cited by 670
Cited by
Simulating galaxy formation with the IllustrisTNG model
Pillepich, A., Springel, V., Nelson, D., Genel, S., Naiman, J., Pakmor, R., Hernquist, L., Torrey, P., Vogelsberger, M., Weinberger, R., et al. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2656 · Cited by 2,007
Theoretical Challenges in Galaxy Formation
Naab, T., & Ostriker, J. P. (2017) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-040019 · Cited by 722
Pontzen, A., & Governato, F. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12953 · Cited by 315
Dale, J. E., Ercolano, B., & Bonnell, I. A. (2012) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21205.x · Cited by 306
What controls star formation in the central 500 pc of the Galaxy?
Kruijssen, J. M. D., Longmore, S. N., Elmegreen, B. G., Murray, N., Bally, J., Testi, L., & Kennicutt, R. C. (2014) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stu494 · Cited by 288
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Murray, N., Quataert, E., & Thompson, T. A.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2009-12-29
- Volume
- 709
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 191-209
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2053619969
- Cited by
- 476
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 14.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE DISRUPTION OF GIANT MOLECULAR CLOUDS BY RADIATION PRESSURE & THE EFFICIENCY OF STAR FORMATION IN GALAXIES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/709/1/191
- The paper
- Murray, N., Quataert, E., & Thompson, T. A. (2010). THE DISRUPTION OF GIANT MOLECULAR CLOUDS BY RADIATION PRESSURE & THE EFFICIENCY OF STAR FORMATION IN GALAXIES. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/709/1/191
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.