The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Continuity Thinking and the Problem of Christian Culture: Belief, Time, and the Anthropology of Christianity
Abstract
To this point, the anthropology of Christianity has largely failed to develop. When anthropologists study Christians, they do not see themselves as contributing to a broad comparative enterprise in the way those studying other world religions do. A close reading of the Comaroffs’ Of Revelation and Revolution illustrates the ways in which anthropologists sideline Christianity and leads to a discussion of reasons the anthropology of Christianity has languished. While it is possible to locate the cause in part in the culture of anthropology, with its emphasis on difference, problems also exist at the theoretical level. Most anthropological theories emphasize cultural continuity as opposed to discontinuity and change. This emphasis becomes problematic where Christianity is concerned, because many kinds of Christianity stress radical change and expect it to occur. Confronted by people claiming that radical Christian change has occurred in their lives, anthropologists become suspicious and often explain away the Christian elements of their cultures. Christian assertions about change are hard for anthropologists to credit because anthropological and Christian models of change are based on different models of time and belief. Unless anthropologists reconsider their nearly exclusive commitment to continuity thinking and the models of time and belief that ground it, the anthropology of Christianity will continue to face handicaps to its development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reading a Modern Classic: W. C. Smith's "The Meaning and End of Religion"
Asad, T. (2001) · History of Religions · doi:10.1086/463633 · Cited by 220 · cited 1×
“…that “Geertz’s treatment of religious belief, which lies at the core of his conception of religion, is a modern, privatized Christian one because and to the extent that it emphasizes the priority of belief as a state of mind rather than as a constituting activity in the world” (Asad 1993, 47).”
BackgroundFetishism as social creativity: or, Fetishes are gods in the process of construction
Graeber, D. (2005) · Anthropological Theory · doi:10.1177/1463499605059230 · Cited by 168
Cited by
The Anthropology of Christianity
(2006) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822388159 · Cited by 330
Between Reproduction and Freedom: Morality, Value, and Radical Cultural Change
Robbins, J. (2007) · Ethnos · doi:10.1080/00141840701576919 · Cited by 279
Self-citationComparison in Anthropology: The Impossible Method
Candea, M. (2018) · doi:10.1017/9781108667609 · Cited by 139
Multiple nostalgias: the fabric of heritage in Luang Prabang ( Lao PDR )
Berliner, D. (2012) · Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9655.2012.01791.x · Cited by 107
Metadata
- Authors
- Robbins, J.
- Venue
- Current Anthropology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2007-02
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-38
- ISSN
- 0011-3204 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5382
- OpenAlex
- W1910136833
- Cited by
- 747
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 113.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.