CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 298Astrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsAstrophysics and Cosmic PhenomenaAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An Unambiguous Detection of Faraday Rotation in Sagittarius A*

Open access
Marrone, Daniel P., Moran, James M., Zhao, Jun-Hui, Rao, Ramprasad·2007·The Astrophysical Journal
DOI 10.1086/510850
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The millimeter/submillimeter wavelength polarization of Sgr A* is known to be variable in both magnitude and position angle on timescales down to a few hours. The unstable polarization has prevented measurements made at different frequencies and different epochs from yielding convincing measurements of Faraday rotation in this source. Here we present observations made with the Submillimeter Array polarimeter at 227 and 343 GHz with sufficient sensitivity to determine the rotation measure at each band without comparing position angles measured at separate epochs. We find the 10-epoch mean rotation measure to be (-5.6 ± 0.7) × 10 5 rad m -2 ; the measurements are consistent with a constant value. We conservatively assign a 3 σ upper limit of 2 × 10 5 rad m -2 to rotation measure changes, which limits accretion rate fluctuations to 25%. This rotation measure detection limits the accretion rate to less than 2 × 10 -7 M ☉ yr -1 if the magnetic field is near equipartition, ordered, and largely radial, while a lower limit of 2 × 10 -9 M ☉ yr -1 holds even for a subequipartition, disordered, or toroidal field. The mean intrinsic position angle is 167 ° ± 7 ° and we detect variations of 31 deg. These variations must originate in the submillimeter photosphere, rather than arising from rotation measure changes.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/510850

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Marrone, D. P. 2006, Ph.D. thesis, Harvard Univ.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–297 of 297

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Marrone, D. P., Moran, J. M., Zhao, J.-H., & Rao, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • Center for Astrophysics Harvard & Smithsonian (US)
  • Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Academia Sinica (TW)
ORCID
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Publisher
American Astronomical Society
Published
2006-12-15
Volume
654
Issue
1
Pages
L57-L60
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
DOI
10.1086/510850
OpenAlex
W2034547856
Cited by
298
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 13
FWCI
7.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Harvard University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Keywords
Sgr A*, Faraday rotation, rotation measure, black hole accretion, accretion rate, magnetic field, supermassive black holes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review