The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Recommendations for Surveillance of Clostridium difficile–Associated Disease
Abstract
Background.: The epidemiology of Clostridium difficile-associated disease (CDAD) is changing, with evidence of increased incidence and severity. However, the understanding of the magnitude of and reasons for this change is currently hampered by the lack of standardized surveillance methods. Objective and Methods.: An ad hoc C. difficile surveillance working group was formed to develop interim surveillance definitions and recommendations based on existing literature and expert opinion that can help to improve CDAD surveillance and prevention efforts. Definitions and Recommendations.: A CDAD case patient was defined as a patient with symptoms of diarrhea or toxic megacolon combined with a positive result of a laboratory assay and/or endoscopic or histopathologic evidence of pseudomembranous colitis. Recurrent CDAD was defined as repeated episodes within 8 weeks of each other. Severe CDAD was defined by CDAD-associated admission to an intensive care unit, colectomy, or death within 30 days after onset. Case patients were categorized by the setting in which C. difficile was likely acquired, to account for recent evidence that suggests that healthcare facility-associated CDAD may have its onset in the community up to 4 weeks after discharge. Tracking of healthcare facility–onset, healthcare facility–associated CDAD is the minimum surveillance required for healthcare settings; tracking of community–onset, healthcare facility–associated CDAD should be performed only in conjunction with tracking of healthcare facility–onset, healthcare facility–associated CDAD. Community–associated CDAD was defined by symptom onset more than 12 weeks after the last discharge from a healthcare facility. Rates of both healthcare facility–onset, healthcare facility–associated CDAD and community–onset, healthcare facility–associated CDAD should be expressed as case patients per 10,000 patient–days; rates of community-associated CDAD should be expressed as case patients per 100,000 person-years.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of Clostridium difficile infections
Surawicz, C. M., Brandt, L. J., Binion, D. G., Ananthakrishnan, A. N., Curry, S. R., Gilligan, P. H., McFarland, L. V., Mellow, M., & Zuckerbraun, B. S. (2013) · American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1038/ajg.2013.4 · Cited by 1,645
The epidemiology of community-acquired Clostridium difficile infection: a population-based study
Khanna, S., Pardi, D. S., Aronson, S. L., Kammer, P. P., Orenstein, R., St Sauver, J. L., Harmsen, S. W., & Zinsmeister, A. R. (2012) · American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1038/ajg.2011.398 · Cited by 622
Abou Chakra, C. N., Pepin, J., Sirard, S., & Valiquette, L. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0098400 · Cited by 328
Surveillance Definitions of Infections in Long-Term Care Facilities: Revisiting the McGeer Criteria
Stone, N. D., Ashraf, M. S., Calder, J., Crnich, C. J., Crossley, K., Drinka, P. J., Gould, C. V., Juthani-Mehta, M., Lautenbach, E., Loeb, M., et al. (2012) · Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology · doi:10.1086/667743 · Cited by 322
Hiensch, R., Poeran, J., Saunders-Hao, P., Adams, V., Powell, C. A., Glasser, A., Mazumdar, M., & Patel, G. (2017) · American Journal of Infection Control · doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2017.04.005 · Cited by 44
Clostridium difficile in the Long-Term Care Facility: Prevention and Management
Jump, R. L. P., & Donskey, C. J. (2015) · Current Geriatrics Reports · doi:10.1007/s13670-014-0108-3 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- McDonald, L. C., Coignard, B., Dubberke, E., Song, X., Horan, T., Kutty, P. K., & the Ad Hoc Clostridium difficile Surveillance Working Group
- Venue
- Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2007-02
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 140-145
- ISSN
- 0899-823X (ISSN-L)
- 1559-6834
- OpenAlex
- W2134665827
- Cited by
- 558
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.