The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Radio Loudness of Active Galactic Nuclei: Observational Facts and Theoretical Implications
Open accessAbstract
We investigate how the total radio luminosity of AGN-powered radio sources depends on their accretion luminosity and the central black hole mass. Our studies cover about 7 orders of magnitude in accretion luminosity (expressed in Eddington units, i.e., as Eddington ratios) and the full range of AGN black hole masses. We find that AGNs form two distinct and well-separated sequences on the radio-loudness-Eddington-ratio plane. The "upper" sequence is formed by radio-selected AGNs, and the "lower" sequence contains mainly optically selected objects. Whereas an apparent "gap" between the two sequences may be an artifact of selection effects, the sequences themselves mark the real upper bounds of radio loudness of two distinct populations of AGNs: those hosted respectively by elliptical and disk galaxies. Both sequences show the same dependence of the radio loudness on the Eddington ratio (an increase with decreasing Eddington ratio), which suggests that the normalization of this dependence is determined by the black hole spin. This implies that central black holes in giant elliptical galaxies have (on average) much larger spins than black holes in spiral/disk galaxies. This galaxy-morphology-related radio dichotomy breaks down at high accretion rates where the dominant fraction of luminous quasars hosted by elliptical galaxies is radio quiet. This led to speculations in the literature that formation of powerful jets at high accretion rates is intermittent and related to switches between two disk accretion modes, as directly observed in some black hole X-ray binaries. We argue that such intermittency can be reconciled with the spin paradigm, provided that successful formation of relativistic jets by rotating black holes requires collimation by MHD outflows from accretion disks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Foundations of Black Hole Accretion Disk Theory
Abramowicz, M. A., & Fragile, P. C. (2013) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2013-1 · Cited by 668
Vasudevan, R. V., & Fabian, A. C. (2007) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12328.x · Cited by 473
Advection-dominated accretion and the black hole event horizon
Narayan, R., & McClintock, J. E. (2008) · New Astronomy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.newar.2008.03.002 · Cited by 451
Measuring Black Hole Spin Using X-Ray Reflection Spectroscopy
Reynolds, C. S. (2014) · Space Science Reviews · doi:10.1007/s11214-013-0006-6 · Cited by 444
Dynamically important magnetic fields near accreting supermassive black holes
Zamaninasab, M., Clausen-Brown, E., Savolainen, T., & Tchekhovskoy, A. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13399 · Cited by 288
Metadata
- Authors
- Sikora, M., Stawarz, Ł., & Lasota, J.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2007-04
- Volume
- 658
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 815-828
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W1987571841
- Cited by
- 516
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Radio Loudness of Active Galactic Nuclei: Observational Facts and Theoretical Implications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/511972
- The paper
- Sikora, M., Stawarz, Ł., & Lasota, J. (2007). Radio Loudness of Active Galactic Nuclei: Observational Facts and Theoretical Implications. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/511972
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.