Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 473

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Piecing together the X-ray background: bolometric corrections for active galactic nuclei: Bolometric corrections for AGN

Open access
Vasudevan, R. V., Fabian, A. C.·2007·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

The X‐ray background can be used to constrain the accretion history of supermassive black holes (SMBHs) in active galactic nuclei (AGN), with the SMBH mass density related to the energy density due to accretion. A knowledge of the hard X‐ray bolometric correction, κ2‐10 keV, is a vital input into these studies, as it allows us to constrain the parameters of the accretion responsible for SMBH growth. Earlier studies assumed a constant bolometric correction for all AGN, and more recent work has suggested accounting for a dependence on AGN luminosity. Until recently, the variations in the disc emission in the ultraviolet (UV) have not been taken into account in this calculation; we show that such variations are important by construction of optical‐to‐X‐ray spectral energy distributions for 54 AGN. In particular, we use Far Ultraviolet Spectroscopic Explorer (FUSE) UV and X‐ray data from the literature to constrain the disc emission as well as possible. We find evidence for very significant spread in the bolometric corrections, with no simple dependence on luminosity being evident. Populations of AGN such as narrow‐line Seyfert 1 nuclei, radio‐loud and X‐ray‐weak AGN may have bolometric corrections which differ systematically from the rest of the AGN population. We identify other sources of uncertainty including intrinsic extinction in the optical–UV, X‐ray and UV variability and uncertainties in SMBH mass estimates. Our results suggest a more well‐defined relationship between the bolometric correction and Eddington ratio in AGN, with a transitional region at an Eddington ratio of ∼0.1, below which the bolometric correction is typically 15–25, and above which it is typically 40–70. We consider the potential‐implied parallels with the low/hard and high/soft states in Galactic black hole (GBH) accretion, and present bolometric corrections for the GBH binary GX 339−4 for comparison. Our findings reinforce previous studies proposing a multistate description of AGN accretion analogous to that for GBH binaries. Future calculations of the SMBH mass density may need to take into account the possible dependence of κ2‐10 keV on the Eddington ratio.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12328.x

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 39 references

Cited by

See all 473

Metadata

Authors
Vasudevan, R. V., & Fabian, A. C.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2007-10-10
Volume
381
Issue
3
Pages
1235-1251
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W1959372452
Cited by
473
References
39
FWCI
15.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Piecing together the X-ray background: bolometric corrections for active galactic nuclei: Bolometric corrections for AGN. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12328.x
The paper
Vasudevan, R. V., & Fabian, A. C. (2007). Piecing together the X-ray background: bolometric corrections for active galactic nuclei: Bolometric corrections for AGN. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12328.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.