The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Reliability of Procalcitonin Concentrations for the Diagnosis of Sepsis in Critically III Neonates
Open accessAbstract
We evaluated the reliability of serum concentrations of procalcitonin for the diagnosis of early- and late-onset sepsis in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) setting. Timed procalcitonin determinations were prospectively obtained during two postnatal periods: 0-48 hours of age (period 1) and 3-30 days of age (period 2). In period 1, we measured procalcitonin concentrations in 83 healthy newborns (group 0) and in 120 NICU patients (14 with culture-proven sepsis, group 1A; 14 with clinical septicemia, group 1B; 75 with no evidence of infection, group 2; and 17 with uncertain findings, group 3). After we established 95% hour-specific reference ranges for group 0, we performed multiple linear regression analyses to determine which maternal, intrapartum, and neonatal complications would affect normal procalcitonin values. Maternal diabetes was the only variable identified in group 2 patients that induced a significant deviation from procalcitonin reference ranges. Analyses of the pooled procalcitonin values obtained for group 1 patients over the 48-hour period after birth yielded a sensitivity of 92.6% and a specificity of 97.5% for procalcitonin concentrations in the detection of early-onset sepsis. In period 2, blood samples from 23 cases with systemic infections were analyzed for procalcitonin concentrations at the onset of signs of infection. The control group was formed by matching four uninfected NICU patients to each infected case. None of the procalcitonin values for the 92 controls overlapped those for the cases (sensitivity and specificity, 100%). Procalcitonin is a promising marker for the diagnosis of early- and late-onset sepsis in neonates at high risk for this infection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A readers' guide to the interpretation of diagnostic test properties: clinical example of sepsis
Fischer, J. E., Bachmann, L. M., & Jaeschke, R. (2003) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-003-1761-8 · Cited by 890
Puopolo, K. M., Benitz, W. E., Zaoutis, T. E., COMMITTEE ON FETUS AND NEWBORN, COMMITTEE ON INFECTIOUS DISEASES, Cummings, J., Juul, S., Hand, I., Eichenwald, E., Poindexter, B., et al. (2018) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2018-2894 · Cited by 459
C-reactive protein: a valuable marker of sepsis
Póvoa, P. (2002) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-002-1209-6 · Cited by 403
Klingenberg, C., Kornelisse, R. F., Buonocore, G., Maier, R. F., & Stocker, M. (2018) · Frontiers in Pediatrics · doi:10.3389/fped.2018.00285 · Cited by 292
Chiesa, C., Pellegrini, G., Panero, A., Osborn, J. F., Signore, F., Assumma, M., & Pacifico, L. (2003) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1373/49.1.60 · Cited by 264
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Chiesa, C., Panero, A., Rossi, N., Stegagno, M., De Giusti, M., Osborn, J. F., & Pacifico, L.
- Venue
- Clinical Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-03
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 664-672
- ISSN
- 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-6591
- OpenAlex
- W1970294295
- Cited by
- 337
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reliability of Procalcitonin Concentrations for the Diagnosis of Sepsis in Critically III Neonates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/514576
- The paper
- Chiesa, C., Panero, A., Rossi, N., Stegagno, M., De Giusti, M., Osborn, J. F., & Pacifico, L. (1998). Reliability of Procalcitonin Concentrations for the Diagnosis of Sepsis in Critically III Neonates. Clinical Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1086/514576
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.