Cited by 371Malaria Research and ControlTravel-related health issuesVector-borne infectious diseases

Imported Malaria: Prospective Analysis of Problems in Diagnosis and Management

Kain, Kevin C., Harrington, Mary Anne, Tennyson, Shan, Keystone, Jay S.·1998·Clinical Infectious Diseases

Abstract

Imported malaria is an increasing problem in many countries. The objective of this study was to prospectively evaluate the diagnosis and treatment of imported malaria cases identified by active surveillance. Microscopic diagnosis at the community level was also compared to reference microscopic and blinded molecular diagnostic methods. Most travelers who acquire malaria had sought pretravel advice from a physician; however, only 11% used recommended chemoprophylaxis and only 17% used insect protection measures. The diagnosis of malaria was initially missed in 59% of cases. Community-based microscopic diagnosis provided incorrect species identification in 64% of cases. After presentation, the average delay before treatment was 7.6 days for falciparum malaria and 5.1 days for vivax malaria. Overall, 7.5% of Plasmodium falciparum-infected patients developed severe malaria, and in 11% of all cases therapy failed. Patients who present to a center without expertise in tropical medicine receive suboptimal treatment. Improvements in recognition, diagnosis, and treatment of malaria are essential to prevent morbidity and death among travelers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/514616

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The current standard for diagnosis is the microscopic examination of Giemsa-stained thick and thin blood smears.

    “The current standard for diagnosis is the microscopic examination of Giemsa-stained thick and thin blood smears (12, 16, 21, 22, 28).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kain, K. C., Harrington, M. A., Tennyson, S., & Keystone, J. S.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Kain, Kevin C.
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
1998-07
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
142-149
ISSN
  • 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6591
OpenAlex
W2169506054
Cited by
371
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 17
FWCI
17.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
World Health Organization
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Malaria Research and Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Travel-related health issues
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Vector-borne infectious diseases
Keywords
imported malaria, malaria diagnosis, malaria treatment, Plasmodium falciparum, Plasmodium vivax, severe malaria, chemoprophylaxis, molecular diagnosis, delayed diagnosis, treatment failure, tropical medicine
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Animals, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Infant, Malaria, Male, Middle Aged, Ontario, Plasmodium, Population Surveillance, Prospective Studies, Travel

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review