The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Tests for Linkage and Association in Nuclear Families
Open accessAbstract
The transmission/disequilibrium test (TDT) originally was introduced to test for linkage between a genetic marker and a disease-susceptibility locus, in the presence of association. Recently, the TDT has been used to test for association in the presence of linkage. The motivation for this is that linkage analysis typically identifies large candidate regions, and further refinement is necessary before a search for the disease gene is begun, on the molecular level. Evidence of association and linkage may indicate which markers in the region are closest to a disease locus. As a test of linkage, transmissions from heterozygous parents to all of their affected children can be included in the TDT; however, the TDT is a valid chi2 test of association only if transmissions to unrelated affected children are used in the analysis. If the sample contains independent nuclear families with multiple affected children, then one procedure that has been used to test for association is to select randomly a single affected child from each sibship and to apply the TDT to those data. As an alternative, we propose two statistics that use data from all of the affected children. The statistics give valid chi2 tests of the null hypothesis of no association or no linkage and generally are more powerful than the TDT with a single, randomly chosen, affected child from each family.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A General Test of Association for Quantitative Traits in Nuclear Families
Abecasis, G. R., Cardon, L. R., & Cookson, W. O. C. (2000) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/302698 · Cited by 1,126
A Genomic Screen of Autism: Evidence for a Multilocus Etiology
Risch, N., Spiker, D., Lotspeich, L., Nouri, N., Hinds, D., Hallmayer, J., Kalaydjieva, L., McCague, P., Dimiceli, S., Pitts, T., et al. (1999) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/302497 · Cited by 684
Rabinowitz, D., & Laird, N. (2000) · Human Heredity · doi:10.1159/000022918 · Cited by 627
A Test for Linkage and Association in General Pedigrees: The Pedigree Disequilibrium Test
Martin, E. R., Monks, S. A., Warren, L. L., & Kaplan, N. L. (2000) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/302957 · Cited by 538
Self-citationFamily-based designs in the age of large-scale gene-association studies
Laird, N. M., & Lange, C. (2006) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1839 · Cited by 450
Metadata
- Authors
- Martin, E. R., Kaplan, N. L., & Weir, B. S.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Human Genetics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1997-08
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 439-448
- ISSN
- 0002-9297 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2070134384
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tests for Linkage and Association in Nuclear Families. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/514860
- The paper
- Martin, E. R., Kaplan, N. L., & Weir, B. S. (1997). Tests for Linkage and Association in Nuclear Families. The American Journal of Human Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1086/514860
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.