Building Solidarity through Generalized Exchange: A Theory of Reciprocity
Abstract
Despite the prevalence of generalized exchange in social life, few studies have investigated the classic anthropological prediction that generalized (indirect) exchange produces greater social solidarity than restricted (direct) exchange. Building on recent work comparing negotiated and reciprocal forms of direct exchange, the authors develop a theory of reciprocity in exchange. The theory argues that two structural characteristics of reciprocity distinguish among all three forms of exchange and affect the emergence of social solidarity through three causal mechanisms. Experimental results provide strong support for the causal logic of the theory and for the predicted ordering of subjective dimensions of solidarity across the three forms of exchange, with generalized indirect exchange > reciprocal direct exchange > negotiated direct exchange.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Reciprocal exchange leads both sides into a stable, self-reinforcing cycle of mutual responsiveness.
“This exchange relationship encourages both parties to work together in a stable and self-reinforcing cycle of mutual responsiveness (Molm et al., 2007).”
From ‘Traffic rewards’, ‘algorithmic visibility’, and ‘advertiser satisfaction’: How Chinese short-video platforms cultivate creators in stages (2024) · cites this paper as Molm et al., 2007
Cites
Evolution of indirect reciprocity
Nowak, M. A., & Sigmund, K. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04131 · Cited by 2,762 · see citing works
Argonauts of the Western Pacific
Malinowski, B. (2002) · doi:10.4324/9780203421260 · Cited by 2,160 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Liu, W., Zhu, R., & Yang, Y. (2010) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.10.014 · Cited by 555 · see citing works
The shadow of indebtedness: bridewealth and norms constraining female reproductive autonomy
Horne, C., Dodoo, F. N.-A., & Dodoo, N. D. (2013) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122413484923 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Zhang, X., Xu, T., Wei, X., Tang, J., & Ordonez de Pablos, P. (2024) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/jkm-10-2022-0791 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Huang, Y., & Ye, W. (2024) · Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies · doi:10.1177/13548565231211117 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Social exchange theory in leadership research: A problematizing review
Madison, K., Eva, N., De Cieri, H., & Goh, Z. (2025) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2025.101924 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
- Authors
- Molm, L. D., Collett, J. L., & Schaefer, D. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Arizona (US)
- University of Notre Dame (US)
- Arizona State University (US)
- ORCID
- Schaefer, David R.
- Venue
- American Journal of Sociology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2007-07
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 205-242
- ISSN
- 0002-9602 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5390
- OpenAlex
- W2104433259
- Cited by
- 589
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 35 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 32.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Sociology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Cross-Cultural and Social Analysis
- Keywords
- generalized exchange, reciprocity, social solidarity, direct exchange, indirect exchange interaction, gift exchange
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review