Cited by 589Social Power and Status DynamicsExperimental Behavioral Economics StudiesCross-Cultural and Social Analysis

Building Solidarity through Generalized Exchange: A Theory of Reciprocity

Molm, Linda D., Collett, Jessica L., Schaefer, David R.·2007·American Journal of Sociology

Abstract

Despite the prevalence of generalized exchange in social life, few studies have investigated the classic anthropological prediction that generalized (indirect) exchange produces greater social solidarity than restricted (direct) exchange. Building on recent work comparing negotiated and reciprocal forms of direct exchange, the authors develop a theory of reciprocity in exchange. The theory argues that two structural characteristics of reciprocity distinguish among all three forms of exchange and affect the emergence of social solidarity through three causal mechanisms. Experimental results provide strong support for the causal logic of the theory and for the predicted ordering of subjective dimensions of solidarity across the three forms of exchange, with generalized indirect exchange > reciprocal direct exchange > negotiated direct exchange.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/517900

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Molm, L. D., Collett, J. L., & Schaefer, D. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • University of Notre Dame (US)
  • Arizona State University (US)
Venue
American Journal of Sociology
Published
2007-07
Volume
113
Issue
1
Pages
205-242
ISSN
  • 0002-9602 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5390
OpenAlex
W2104433259
Cited by
589
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 20
FWCI
32.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Journal of Sociology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Cross-Cultural and Social Analysis
Keywords
generalized exchange, reciprocity, social solidarity, direct exchange, indirect exchange interaction, gift exchange

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review