The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Star Formation in AEGIS Field Galaxies since z = 1.1: Staged Galaxy Formation and a Model of Mass-dependent Gas Exhaustion
Open accessAbstract
We analyze star formation (SF) as a function of stellar mass ( M * ) and redshift z in the All-Wavelength Extended Groth Strip International Survey, for star-forming field galaxies with M * ≳ 10 10 M ☉ out to z = 1.1. The data indicate that the high specific SF rates (SFRs) of many less massive galaxies do not represent late, irregular or recurrent, starbursts in evolved galaxies. They rather seem to reflect the onset (initial burst) of the dominant SF episode of galaxies, after which SF gradually declines on gigayear timescales to z = 0 and forms the bulk of a galaxy's M * . With decreasing mass, this onset of major SF shifts to decreasing z for an increasing fraction of galaxies ( staged galaxy formation ). This process may be an important component of the "downsizing" phenomenon. We find that the predominantly gradual decline of SFRs described by Noeske et al. can be reproduced by exponential SF histories ( τ models ), if less massive galaxies have systematically longer e -folding times τ, and a later onset of SF ( z f ). Our model can provide a first parameterization of SFR as a function of M * and z , and quantify mass dependences of τ and z f , from direct observations of M * and SFRs up to z > 1. The observed evolution of SF in galaxies can plausibly reflect the dominance of gradual gas exhaustion. The data are also consistent with the history of cosmological accretion onto dark matter halos.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Star Formation in the Milky Way and Nearby Galaxies
Kennicutt, R. C., & Evans, N. J. (2012) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125610 · Cited by 2,902
“Direct evidence for this “downsizing” is seen in observations of the SSFR vs mass relation in high-redshift galaxies (e.g., Noeske et al. 2007).”
BackgroundA HIGHLY CONSISTENT FRAMEWORK FOR THE EVOLUTION OF THE STAR-FORMING “MAIN SEQUENCE” FROM z ∼ 0-6
Speagle, J. S., Steinhardt, C. L., Capak, P. L., & Silverman, J. D. (2014) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/214/2/15 · Cited by 1,646
Galactic star formation and accretion histories from matching galaxies to dark matter haloes
Moster, B. P., Naab, T., & White, S. D. M. (2013) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sts261 · Cited by 1,431
Physical Models of Galaxy Formation in a Cosmological Framework
Somerville, R. S., & Davé, R. (2015) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-140951 · Cited by 1,442
Self-citationDusty star-forming galaxies at high redshift
Casey, C. M., Narayanan, D., & Cooray, A. (2014) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.02.009 · Cited by 800
Metadata
- Authors
- Noeske, K. G., Faber, S. M., Weiner, B. J., Koo, D. C., Primack, J. R., Dekel, A., Papovich, C., Conselice, C. J., Le Floc'h, E., Rieke, G. H., Coil, A. L., Lotz, J. M., Somerville, R. S., & Bundy, K.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2007-04-03
- Volume
- 660
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- L47-L50
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W1980904486
- Cited by
- 427
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Star Formation in AEGIS Field Galaxies since z = 1.1: Staged Galaxy Formation and a Model of Mass-dependent Gas Exhaustion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/517927
- The paper
- Noeske, K. G., Faber, S. M., Weiner, B. J., Koo, D. C., Primack, J. R., Dekel, A., Papovich, C., Conselice, C. J., Le Floc'h, E., Rieke, G. H., Coil, A. L., Lotz, J. M., Somerville, R. S., & Bundy, K. (2007). Star Formation in AEGIS Field Galaxies since z = 1.1: Staged Galaxy Formation and a Model of Mass-dependent Gas Exhaustion. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/517927
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.