The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Phonetic Symbolism and Brand Name Preference
Abstract
Two experiments investigated the effects of phonetic symbolism on brand name preference. Participants indicated preference for fictitious brand names for particular products (or for products with particular attributes) from word pairs that differed only on vowel sound (e.g., front vs. back vowels, or vowel sounds associated with positive vs. negative concepts). Participants preferred brand names more when the attributes connoted by the vowel sounds (e.g., small, sharp) were positive for a product category (e.g., convertible, knife), but they preferred the same names less when the attributes connoted were negative for a product category (e.g., sport utility vehicle, hammer). However, words with negative vowel sounds were least preferred regardless of product category or attribute.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Textual paralanguage and its implications for marketing communications
Luangrath, A. W., Peck, J., & Barger, V. A. (2017) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2016.05.002 · Cited by 221
That Sounds Sweet: Using Cross‐Modal Correspondences to Communicate Gustatory Attributes
Knoeferle, K. M., Woods, A., Käppler, F., & Spence, C. (2015) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.20766 · Cited by 137
The effects of uppercase and lowercase wordmarks on brand perceptions
Xu, X., Chen, R., & Liu, M. W. (2017) · Marketing Letters · doi:10.1007/s11002-016-9415-0 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Lowrey, T. M., & Shrum, L. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Consumer Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-10
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 406-414
- ISSN
- 0093-5301 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5277
- OpenAlex
- W2124861461
- Cited by
- 325
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phonetic Symbolism and Brand Name Preference. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/518530
- The paper
- Lowrey, T. M., & Shrum, L. J. (2007). Phonetic Symbolism and Brand Name Preference. Journal of Consumer Research. https://doi.org/10.1086/518530
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.