Cited by 137Multisensory perception and integrationCategorization, perception, and languageTactile and Sensory Interactions

That Sounds Sweet: Using Cross‐Modal Correspondences to Communicate Gustatory Attributes

Knoeferle, Klemens M., Woods, Andy, Käppler, Florian, Spence, Charles·2015·Psychology & Marketing

Abstract

ABSTRACT Building on existing research into sound symbolism and cross‐modal correspondences, this article proposes that cross‐modal correspondences—systematic mappings between different sensory modalities—can be used to communicate nonmusical, low‐level sensory properties such as basic tastes through music. A series of three experiments demonstrates that cross‐modal correspondences enable people to systematically encode basic taste properties into parameters in musical space (Experiment 1), and that they are able to correctly decode basic taste information embedded in complex musical compositions (Experiments 2 and 3). The results also suggest some culture‐specificity to these mappings, given that decoding performance, while still above chance levels, was lower in Indian participants than in those from the United States (Experiment 3). Implications and potential applications of these findings are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mar.20766

Cites

86 of 86 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Knoeferle, K. M., Woods, A., Käppler, F., & Spence, C.
Affiliations
  • BI Norwegian Business School (NO)
  • Xperiment
  • Trossingen University of Music (DE)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Knoeferle, Klemens M.
Venue
Psychology & Marketing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-12-11
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
107-120
ISSN
  • 0742-6046 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6793
OpenAlex
W2164682534
Cited by
137
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 14
FWCI
13.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychology and Marketing (publishedVersion)
  • BIBSYS Brage (BIBSYS (Norway)) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Swiss National Science Foundation
  • University of Oxford (PBSGP1_141347)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
cross-modal correspondence, sound symbolism, basic taste, music perception, cultural specificity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review